IA · rules
Iowa Ct. R. 51:3.7
PARTICIPATION IN EDUCATIONAL, RELIGIOUS, CHARITABLE, FRATERNAL, OR CIVIC ORGANIZATIONS AND ACTIVITIES
(A) Subject to the requirements of rule 51:3.1, a judge may participate in activities
sponsored by organizations or governmental entities concerned with the law, the legal system,
the provision of legal services, or the administration of justice, and those sponsored by or on
behalf of educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organizations not conducted for
profit, including but not limited to the following activities:
(1) assisting such an organization or entity in planning related to fund-raising, volunteering
goods or services at fundraising events, and participating in the management and investment
of the organization’s or entity’s funds;
(2) soliciting* contributions* for such an organization or entity, but only from members
of the judge’s family,* or from judges over whom the judge does not exercise supervisory or
appellate authority;
(3) appearing or speaking at, receiving an award or other recognition at, being featured
on the program of, and permitting his or her title to be used in connection with an event of
such an organization or entity, but if the event serves a fund-raising purpose, the judge may
participate only if the event concerns the law, the legal system, the provision of legal services,
or the administration of justice;
(4) making recommendations to such a public or private fund-granting organization or
entity in connection with its programs and activities, but only if the organization or entity is
concerned with the law, the legal system, the provision of legal services, or the administration
of justice; and
(5) serving as an officer, director, trustee, or nonlegal advisor of such an organization or
entity, unless it is likely that the organization or entity:
(a) will be engaged in proceedings that would ordinarily come before the judge; or
(b) will frequently be engaged in adversary proceedings in the court of which the judge is a
member, or in any court subject to the appellate jurisdiction of the court of which the judge is
a member.
(B) A judge may encourage lawyers to provide pro bono publico legal services.
(C) Subject to the requirements of rule 51:3.1, a judge may:
(1) provide leadership in identifying and addressing issues involving equal access to the
justice system; developing public education programs; engaging in activities to promote the
fair administration of justice and convening, participating or assisting in advisory committees
and community collaborations devoted to the improvement of the law, the legal system, the
provision of legal services, or the administration of justice.
(2) endorse projects and programs directly related to the law, the legal system, the provision
of legal services, and the administration of justice to those coming before the courts.
(3) participate in programs concerning the law or which promote the administration of
justice.
Comment
[1] The activities permitted by paragraph (A) generally include those sponsored by or undertaken
on behalf of public or private not-for-profit educational institutions, and other not-for-profit
organizations, including law-related, charitable, and other organizations.
[2] Even for law-related organizations, a judge should consider whether the membership and
purposes of the organization, or the nature of the judge’s participation in or association with
the organization, would conflict with the judge’s obligation to refrain from activities that reflect
adversely upon a judge’s independence, integrity, and impartiality.
[3] Attendance at fundraising events and volunteering services or goods at or in support of
fundraising events do not present an element of coercion or abuse the prestige of the judicial office
and are not prohibited by this rule.
[4] In addition to appointing lawyers to serve as counsel for indigent parties in individual cases,
a judge may promote broader access to justice by encouraging lawyers to participate in pro bono
publico legal services, if in doing so the judge does not employ coercion or abuse the prestige of
judicial office. Such encouragement may take many forms, including providing lists of available
programs, training lawyers to do pro bono publico legal work, and participating in events recognizing
lawyers who have done pro bono publico work.
[5] Judges, as parents, may assist their children in their fundraising activities if the procedures
employed are not coercive and the sums nominal.
History
[Court Order April 30, 2010, effective May 3, 2010]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
ce56e8a172607b34f29906d8485de1ebab29ccbaa567a4add5b393eef613097a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.