IA · rules
Iowa Ct. R. 51:3.14
REIMBURSEMENT OF EXPENSES AND WAIVERS OF FEES OR CHARGES
(A) Unless otherwise prohibited by rules 51:3.1 and 51:3.13(A) or other law,* a judge may
accept reimbursement of necessary and reasonable expenses for travel, food, lodging, or other
incidental expenses, or a waiver or partial waiver of fees or charges for registration, tuition,
and similar items, from sources other than the judge’s employing entity, if the expenses or
charges are associated with the judge’s participation in extrajudicial activities permitted by
the Iowa Code of Judicial Conduct.
(B) Reimbursement of expenses for necessary travel, food, lodging, or other incidental
expenses shall be limited to the actual costs reasonably incurred by the judge and, when
appropriate to the occasion, by the judge’s spouse, domestic partner*, or guest.
Comment
[1] Educational, civic, religious, fraternal, and charitable organizations often sponsor meetings,
seminars, symposia, dinners, awards ceremonies, and similar events. Judges are encouraged
to attend educational programs, as both teachers and participants, in law-related and academic
disciplines, in furtherance of their duty to remain competent in the law. Participation in a variety of
other extrajudicial activity is also permitted and encouraged by the Iowa Code of Judicial Conduct.
[2] Not infrequently, sponsoring organizations invite certain judges to attend seminars or other
events on a fee-waived or partial-fee-waived basis, and sometimes include reimbursement for
necessary travel, food, lodging, or other incidental expenses. A judge’s decision whether to accept
reimbursement of expenses or a waiver or partial waiver of fees or charges in connection with these
or other extrajudicial activities must be based upon an assessment of all the circumstances. The
judge must undertake a reasonable inquiry to obtain the information necessary to make an informed
judgment about whether acceptance would be consistent with the requirements of this Code.
[3] A judge must assure himself or herself that acceptance of reimbursement or fee waivers would
not appear to a reasonable person to undermine the judge’s independence, integrity, or impartiality.
The factors that a judge should consider when deciding whether to accept reimbursement or a fee
waiver for attendance at a particular activity include:
(a) whether the sponsor is an accredited educational institution or bar association rather than a
trade association or a for-profit entity;
(b) whether the funding comes largely from numerous contributors rather than from a single entity
and is earmarked for programs with specific content;
(c) whether the content is related or unrelated to the subject matter of litigation pending or
impending before the judge, or to matters that are likely to come before the judge;
(d) whether the activity is primarily educational rather than recreational, and whether the costs of
the event are reasonable and comparable to those associated with similar events sponsored by the
judiciary, bar associations, or similar groups;
(e) whether information concerning the activity and its funding sources is available upon inquiry;
(f) whether the sponsor or source of funding is generally associated with particular parties
or interests currently appearing or likely to appear in the judge’s court, thus possibly requiring
disqualification or recusal of the judge under rule 51:2.11;
(g) whether differing viewpoints are presented; and
(h) whether a broad range of judicial and nonjudicial participants are invited, whether a large
number of participants are invited, and whether the program is designed specifically for judges.
History
[Court Order April 30, 2010, effective May 3, 2010]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
046e0faa10df9b9a3fce28bd9ddd9e1f5e73c5378123104f972bf131077b64f0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.