Bindinglaw

IA · rules

Iowa Ct. R. 40.3

Processing applications

activein force · 2021-10-01 – presentact-effective-date

40.3(1) The executive director of the office of professional regulation will cause each such

application to be sent to the commissioners or other parties or organizations for investigation and

report. A copy must be served upon or sent by certified mail to the lawyer, at the lawyer’s last-known

address, who it is claimed committed the dishonest act. Whenever feasible, any investigative lawyer

to whom such application is referred must not practice in the county wherein the alleged defalcating

attorney practiced.

40.3(2) When, in the opinion of the person or persons to whom the application has been referred

for investigation the application is clearly not for a reimbursable loss, no further investigation need

be conducted, but a report with respect to such application must be made to the commission.

40.3(3) The person or persons to whom a report is referred for investigation will conduct such

investigation as to them seems necessary and desirable in order to determine whether the claim is for

a reimbursable loss and in order to guide the commissioners in determining the extent, if any, to which

the claim must be reimbursed from the fund. Any information so obtained by the person or persons

will be used solely by or for the commissioners and will constitute confidential information. When

information is received by the commission indicating an apparent violation of the criminal laws by a

lawyer, such information must be reported to the attorney disciplinary board.

40.3(4) Reports with respect to applications must be submitted by the executive director of the

office of professional regulation to each member of the commission as soon as reasonably possible.

40.3(5) At the meetings of the commission the commissioners will conduct such investigation

or review as seems necessary or desirable in order to determine whether the applications are for a

reimbursable loss and to guide the commissioners in determining the extent, if any, to which the

applicant may be reimbursed. After studying the summaries or applications to be processed, any

commissioner may request that testimony be presented. Absent such recommendation or request,

applications will be processed on the basis of information contained in the report of the person or

persons who investigated such application and in the summary. In all cases, the alleged defalcating

attorney or the attorney’s personal representative must be given an opportunity to be heard by the

commissioners if they so request.

40.3(6) The commission in its sole discretion will determine the amount of loss, if any, for which

any person may be reimbursed from the fund. See Iowa Ct. R. 39.9(2). However, the maximum

amount that any one claimant may recover from the fund is $100,000 and the aggregate maximum

amount which may be recovered from the fund because of the dishonest conduct of any one attorney

is $300,000.

Comment: The November 26, 2013, amendments of claim reimbursement limits apply only to

claims arising from attorney conduct occurring on or after January 1, 2014.

History

[Regulation amendment July 8, 1981; Court Order July 16, 1984; December 15, 1994, effective January 3, 1995; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; November 26, 2013, effective January 1, 2014; July 1, 2005; December 13, 2017, effective January 1, 2018; September 14, 2021, effective October 1, 2021]

Provenance

Source
www.legis.iowa.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
d60ec587237ec965c445a9181b32881d01d6b1b417c6dbc61c01a3d6e6feb1ef
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.