IA · rules
Iowa Ct. R. 40.3
Processing applications
40.3(1) The executive director of the office of professional regulation will cause each such
application to be sent to the commissioners or other parties or organizations for investigation and
report. A copy must be served upon or sent by certified mail to the lawyer, at the lawyer’s last-known
address, who it is claimed committed the dishonest act. Whenever feasible, any investigative lawyer
to whom such application is referred must not practice in the county wherein the alleged defalcating
attorney practiced.
40.3(2) When, in the opinion of the person or persons to whom the application has been referred
for investigation the application is clearly not for a reimbursable loss, no further investigation need
be conducted, but a report with respect to such application must be made to the commission.
40.3(3) The person or persons to whom a report is referred for investigation will conduct such
investigation as to them seems necessary and desirable in order to determine whether the claim is for
a reimbursable loss and in order to guide the commissioners in determining the extent, if any, to which
the claim must be reimbursed from the fund. Any information so obtained by the person or persons
will be used solely by or for the commissioners and will constitute confidential information. When
information is received by the commission indicating an apparent violation of the criminal laws by a
lawyer, such information must be reported to the attorney disciplinary board.
40.3(4) Reports with respect to applications must be submitted by the executive director of the
office of professional regulation to each member of the commission as soon as reasonably possible.
40.3(5) At the meetings of the commission the commissioners will conduct such investigation
or review as seems necessary or desirable in order to determine whether the applications are for a
reimbursable loss and to guide the commissioners in determining the extent, if any, to which the
applicant may be reimbursed. After studying the summaries or applications to be processed, any
commissioner may request that testimony be presented. Absent such recommendation or request,
applications will be processed on the basis of information contained in the report of the person or
persons who investigated such application and in the summary. In all cases, the alleged defalcating
attorney or the attorney’s personal representative must be given an opportunity to be heard by the
commissioners if they so request.
40.3(6) The commission in its sole discretion will determine the amount of loss, if any, for which
any person may be reimbursed from the fund. See Iowa Ct. R. 39.9(2). However, the maximum
amount that any one claimant may recover from the fund is $100,000 and the aggregate maximum
amount which may be recovered from the fund because of the dishonest conduct of any one attorney
is $300,000.
Comment: The November 26, 2013, amendments of claim reimbursement limits apply only to
claims arising from attorney conduct occurring on or after January 1, 2014.
History
[Regulation amendment July 8, 1981; Court Order July 16, 1984; December 15, 1994, effective January 3, 1995; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; November 26, 2013, effective January 1, 2014; July 1, 2005; December 13, 2017, effective January 1, 2018; September 14, 2021, effective October 1, 2021]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
d60ec587237ec965c445a9181b32881d01d6b1b417c6dbc61c01a3d6e6feb1ef
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.