IA · rules
Iowa Ct. R. 37.6
Corporate Transparency Act Beneficial Ownership Information reporting
37.6(1) Purpose. The purpose of this rule is to clarify that it is not the unauthorized practice of
law for nonlawyers to assist clients in determining whether such clients are required to file
Beneficial Ownership Information reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act (31 U.S.C.
5336) and to prepare, complete, and file Beneficial Ownership Information reports on behalf of
their clients with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the U.S. Department of
the Treasury.
37.6(2) Beneficial Ownership Information reporting defined. For purposes of this Rule 37.6,
“Beneficial Ownership Information reporting” means the filing of any reports or other
information required pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act (31 U.S.C. 5336), including,
without limitation, initial reports, updated reports, corrected reports, and exempt reports.
37.6(3) Scope of practice authorized. It is not the unauthorized practice of law for nonlawyers
to assist their clients in determining whether such clients are required to file Beneficial
Ownership Information reports pursuant to the Corporate Transparency Act (31 U.S.C. 5336) and
to prepare, complete, and file Beneficial Ownership Information reports on behalf of their clients
with the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, a bureau of the U.S. Department of the
Treasury.
History
[Court Order September 9, 2024]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
57f95910de95502117abd9aec55a6a21d766d83f5086f8e6f7d376ca1312adaa
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.