IA · rules
Iowa Ct. R. 37.2
Injunctions
37.2(1) If the commission has reasonable cause to believe that any person who has not been
admitted to practice law within this state is engaging in the practice of law or holding out to the
public that the person is qualified to provide services constituting the practice of law in this state,
the commission may file a verified complaint with the clerk of the district court in any county in
which the unauthorized practice is alleged to have occurred.
37.2(2) The complaint must be filed with the clerk of the district court, be given a docket
number, and be captioned in the Iowa District Court for ______ County. The commission must be
designated as the complainant. The respondent must be named and designated as the respondent.
The complaint must be presented to the chief judge of the judicial district for entry of an order to
be served on the respondent requiring that person to appear before the court and show cause why
that person should not be enjoined from such activity. The show-cause hearing will be held before
the chief judge or another judge designated by the chief judge.
37.2(3) If it appears that the facts are incapable of being adequately developed at a summary
hearing, the matter may be set for trial before that judge, who will hear the evidence and make
findings of fact and an appropriate dispositional order.
History
[Court Order April 17, 1990, effective June 1, 1990; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; December 13, 2017, effective January 1, 2018]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
16c288434f9b0b628b5ef377999ee420af61ea5c432daee994c53043db254d56
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.