Iowa R. Prof'l Conduct 32:8.3

(a) A lawyer who knows that another lawyer has committed a violation of the Iowa Rules of

Professional Conduct shall inform the appropriate professional authority.

(b) A lawyer who knows that a judge has committed a violation of applicable rules of judicial

conduct shall inform the appropriate authority.

(c) This rule does not require disclosure of information otherwise protected by rule 32:1.6

or Iowa Code section 622.10 or information gained by a lawyer or judge while participating in

an approved lawyers assistance program.

Comment

[1] Self-regulation of the legal profession requires that members of the profession initiate

disciplinary investigation when they know of a violation of the Iowa Rules of Professional Conduct.

Lawyers have a similar obligation with respect to judicial misconduct. An apparently isolated

violation may indicate a pattern of misconduct that only a disciplinary investigation can uncover.

Reporting a violation is especially important where the victim is unlikely to discover the offense.

[2] A report about misconduct is not required where it would involve violation of rule 32:1.6 or

Iowa Code section 622.10. However, a lawyer should encourage a client to consent to disclosure

where prosecution of the professional misconduct would not substantially prejudice the client’s

interests.

[3] (Reserved)

[4] The duty to report professional misconduct does not apply to a lawyer retained to represent

a lawyer whose professional conduct is in question. Such a situation is governed by the rules

applicable to the client-lawyer relationship and Iowa Code section 622.10.

[5] Information about a lawyer’s or judge’s misconduct or fitness may be received by a lawyer in

the course of that lawyer’s participation in an approved lawyers or judges assistance program. In

that circumstance, providing for an exception to the reporting requirements of paragraphs (a) and (b)

of this rule encourages lawyers and judges to seek treatment through such a program. Conversely,

without such an exception, lawyers and judges may hesitate to seek assistance from these programs,

which may then result in additional harm to their professional careers and additional injury to

the welfare of clients and the public. These rules do not otherwise address the confidentiality of

information received by a lawyer or judge participating in an approved lawyers assistance program;

such an obligation, however, may be imposed by the rules of the program or other law.