IA · rules
Iowa R. Prof'l Conduct 32:6.4
Law reform activities affecting client interests
A lawyer may serve as a director, officer, or member of an organization involved in reform
of the law or its administration notwithstanding that the reform may affect the interests of a
client of the lawyer. When the lawyer knows that the interests of a client may be materially
benefitted by a decision in which the lawyer participates, the lawyer shall disclose that fact but
need not identify the client.
Comment
[1] Lawyers involved in organizations seeking law reform generally do not have a client-lawyer
relationship with the organization. Otherwise, it might follow that a lawyer could not be involved in
a bar association law reform program that might indirectly affect a client. See also rule 32:1.2(b).
For example, a lawyer specializing in antitrust litigation might be regarded as disqualified from
participating in drafting revisions of rules governing that subject. In determining the nature and
scope of participation in such activities, a lawyer should be mindful of obligations to clients under
other rules, particularly rule 32:1.7. A lawyer is professionally obligated to protect the integrity of
the program by making an appropriate disclosure within the organization when the lawyer knows a
private client might be materially benefitted.
History
[Court Order April 20, 2005, effective July 1, 2005]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
8b3e014f994fc95f4dfd9074c13b71a9cc0296effca286c0b1ac1bc826b0c748
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.