IA · rules
Iowa R. Prof'l Conduct 32:4.1
Truthfulness in statements to others
In the course of representing a client, a lawyer shall not knowingly:
(a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or
(b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid
assisting a criminal or fraudulent act by a client, unless disclosure is prohibited by rule 32:1.6.
Comment
Misrepresentation
[1] A lawyer is required to be truthful when dealing with others on a client’s behalf, but generally
has no affirmative duty to inform an opposing party of relevant facts. A misrepresentation can occur
if the lawyer incorporates or affirms a statement of another person that the lawyer knows is false.
Misrepresentations can also occur by partially true but misleading statements or omissions that are
the equivalent of affirmative false statements. For dishonest conduct that does not amount to a false
statement or for misrepresentations by a lawyer other than in the course of representing a client, see
rule 32:8.4.
Statements of Fact
[2] This rule refers to statements of fact. Whether a particular statement should be regarded as
one of fact can depend on the circumstances. Under generally accepted conventions in negotiation,
certain types of statements ordinarily are not taken as statements of material fact. Estimates of price
or value placed on the subject of a transaction and a party’s intentions as to an acceptable settlement
of a claim are ordinarily in this category, and so is the existence of an undisclosed principal except
where nondisclosure of the principal would constitute fraud. Lawyers should be mindful of their
obligations under applicable law to avoid criminal and tortious misrepresentation.
Crime or Fraud by Client
[3] Under rule 32:1.2(d), a lawyer is prohibited from counseling or assisting a client in conduct that
the lawyer knows is criminal or fraudulent. Paragraph (b) states a specific application of the principle
set forth in rule 32:1.2(d) and addresses the situation where a client’s crime or fraud takes the form
of a lie or misrepresentation. Ordinarily, a lawyer can avoid assisting a client’s crime or fraud by
withdrawing from the representation. Sometimes it may be necessary for the lawyer to give notice
of the fact of withdrawal and to disaffirm an opinion, document, affirmation, or the like. In extreme
cases, substantive law may require a lawyer to disclose information relating to the representation to
avoid being deemed to have assisted the client’s crime or fraud. If the lawyer can avoid assisting
a client’s crime or fraud only by disclosing this information, then under paragraph (b) the lawyer is
required to do so, unless the disclosure is prohibited by rule 32:1.6.
History
[Court Order April 20, 2005, effective July 1, 2005]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
af8ac5b35fd16a6bb895d87f4afd812cbfba021c3698ca05b9bb267716141cff
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.