IA · rules
Iowa R. Prof'l Conduct 32:3.4
Fairness to opposing party and counsel
A lawyer shall not:
(a) unlawfully obstruct another party’s access to evidence or unlawfully alter, destroy, or
conceal a document or other material having potential evidentiary value. A lawyer shall not
counsel or assist another person to do any such act;
(b) falsify evidence, counsel or assist a witness to testify falsely, or offer an inducement to a
witness that is prohibited by law;
(c) knowingly disobey an obligation under the rules of a tribunal except for an open refusal
based on an assertion that no valid obligation exists;
(d) in pretrial procedure, make a frivolous discovery request or fail to make a reasonably
diligent effort to comply with a legally proper discovery request by an opposing party;
(e) in trial, allude to any matter that the lawyer does not reasonably believe is relevant or
that will not be supported by admissible evidence, assert personal knowledge of facts in issue
except when testifying as a witness, or state a personal opinion as to the justness of a cause,
the credibility of a witness, the culpability of a civil litigant, or the guilt or innocence of an
accused; or
(f) request a person other than a client to refrain from voluntarily giving relevant
information to another party unless:
(1) the person is a relative or an employee or other agent of a client; and
(2) the lawyer reasonably believes that the person’s interests will not be adversely affected
by refraining from giving such information.
Comment
[1] The procedure of the adversary system contemplates that the evidence in a case is to be
marshaled competitively by the contending parties. Fair competition in the adversary system is
secured by prohibitions against destruction or concealment of evidence, improperly influencing
witnesses, obstructive tactics in discovery procedure, and the like.
[2] Documents and other items of evidence are often essential to establish a claim or defense.
Subject to evidentiary privileges, the right of an opposing party, including the government, to obtain
evidence through discovery or subpoena is an important procedural right. The exercise of that right
can be frustrated if relevant material is altered, concealed, or destroyed. The law may make it an
offense to destroy material for the purpose of impairing its availability in a pending proceeding or
one whose commencement can be foreseen. Falsifying evidence is also generally a criminal offense.
Paragraph (a) applies to evidentiary material generally, including computerized information. The
law may permit a lawyer to take temporary possession of physical evidence of client crimes for the
purpose of conducting a limited examination that will not alter or destroy material characteristics of
the evidence. In such a case, the law may require the lawyer to turn the evidence over to the police
or other prosecuting authority, depending on the circumstances.
[3] With regard to paragraph (b), it is not improper to pay a witness’s expenses, including loss of
time in attending or testifying, or to compensate an expert witness on terms permitted by law. It is
improper to pay an occurrence witness any fee other than as authorized by law for testifying and it is
improper to pay an expert witness a contingent fee.
[4] Paragraph (f) permits a lawyer to advise employees of a client to refrain from giving
information to another party, for the employees may identify their interests with those of the client.
See also rule 32:4.2.
History
[Court Order April 20, 2005, effective July 1, 2005]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
aebd179a1cd76d297ed807a06ebca4b1a0ea7fcaa99d4d6c579704feac49fa72
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.