IA · rules
Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.981
On what claims
Summary judgment may be had under the following conditions and
circumstances:
1.981(1) For claimant. A party seeking to recover upon a claim, counterclaim, cross-petition or
cross-claim or to obtain a declaratory judgment may, at any time after the appearance day or after
the filing of a motion for summary judgment by the adverse party, move with or without supporting
affidavits for a summary judgment in that party’s favor upon all or any part thereof.
1.981(2) For defending party. A party against whom a claim, counterclaim, cross-petition or
cross-claim is asserted or a declaratory judgment is sought may, at any time, move with or without
supporting affidavits for a summary judgment in that party’s favor as to all or any part thereof.
1.981(3) Motion and proceedings thereon. The motion shall be filed not less than 60 days prior
to the date the case is set for trial, unless otherwise ordered by the court. Any party resisting the
motion shall file a resistance within 15 days, unless otherwise ordered by the court, from the time
when a copy of the motion has been served. The resistance shall include a statement of disputed
facts, if any, and a memorandum of authorities supporting the resistance. If affidavits supporting the
resistance are filed, they must be filed with the resistance. Notwithstanding the provisions of rules
1.431 and 1.435, the time fixed for hearing or nonoral submission shall be not less than 20 days after
the filing of the motion, unless a shorter time is ordered by the court. The judgment sought shall be
rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file,
together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that
the moving party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law. A summary judgment, interlocutory in
character, may be rendered on the issue of liability alone although there is a genuine issue as to the
amount of damages.
1.981(4) Case not fully adjudicated on motion. If on motion under this rule judgment is not
rendered upon the whole case or for all the relief asked and a trial is necessary, the court at the
hearing of the motion, by examining the pleadings and the evidence before it and by interrogating
counsel, shall if practicable ascertain what material facts exist without substantial controversy and
what material facts are actually and in good faith controverted. It shall thereupon make an order
specifying the facts that appear without substantial controversy, including the extent to which the
amount of damages or other relief is not in controversy, and directing such further proceedings in the
action as are just. Upon the trial of the action the facts so specified shall be deemed established, and
the trial shall be conducted accordingly.
1.981(5) Form of affidavits; further testimony; defense required. Supporting and opposing
affidavits shall be made on personal knowledge, shall set forth such facts as would be admissible in
evidence, and shall show affirmatively that the affiant is competent to testify to the matters stated
therein. Sworn or certified copies of all papers or parts thereof referred to in an affidavit shall be
attached thereto or filed therewith. The court may permit affidavits to be supplemented or opposed
by depositions, answers to interrogatories, further affidavits, or oral testimony. When a motion for
summary judgment is made and supported as provided in this rule, an adverse party may not rest
upon the mere allegations or denials in the pleadings, but the response, by affidavits or as otherwise
provided in this rule, must set forth specific facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial. If
the adverse party does not so respond, summary judgment, if appropriate, shall be entered.
1.981(6) When affidavits are unavailable. Should it appear from the affidavits of a party opposing
the motion that the party for reasons stated cannot present by affidavit facts essential to justify the
opposition, the court may refuse the application for judgment or may order a continuance to permit
affidavits to be obtained or depositions to be taken or discovery to be had or may make such other
order as is just.
1.981(7) Affidavits made in bad faith. Should it appear to the satisfaction of the court at any time
that any of the affidavits presented pursuant to this rule are presented in bad faith or solely for the
purpose of delay, the court shall forthwith order the party employing them to pay to the other party
the amount of the reasonable expenses which the filing of the affidavits caused that party to incur,
including reasonable attorney’s fees, and any offending party or attorney may be adjudged guilty of
contempt.
1.981(8) Supporting statement and memorandum. Upon any motion for summary judgment
pursuant to this rule, there shall be annexed to the motion a separate, short and concise statement
of the material facts as to which the moving party contends there is no genuine issue to be tried,
including specific reference to those parts of the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories,
admissions on file and affidavits which support such contentions and a memorandum of authorities.
History
[Report 1943; amendment 1967; amendment 1975; amendment 1980; July 15, 1991, effective January 2, 1992; October 31, 1997, effective January 24, 1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; Court Order September 14, 2017, temporarily effective September 14, 2017, permanently effective November 14, 2017]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
c3f9beca39edd12936d8c29bd0ec81c532ee0069abd41773d05bbb31e050d533
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.