IA · rules
Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.508
Discovery of experts
1.508(1) Expert who is expected to be called as a witness. In addition to the disclosures
and discovery provided pursuant to rules 1.500(2) and 1.516, discovery of facts known, mental
impressions, and opinions held by an expert whom the other party expects to call as a witness at
trial, otherwise discoverable under the provisions of rule 1.503(1) and acquired or developed in
anticipation of litigation or for trial, may be obtained as follows:
a. Deposition of an expert who may testify. A party may depose any person who has been identified
as an expert whose opinions may be presented at trial. If rule 1.500(2)(b) requires a report from the
expert, the deposition may be conducted only after the report is provided.
b. Discovery by other means. Subject to rules 1.508(1)(d) and (e), a party may also obtain
discovery of documents and tangible things including all tangible reports, physical models,
compilations of data, and other material prepared by an expert or for an expert in anticipation of the
expert’s trial and deposition testimony. The disclosure of material prepared by an expert used for
consultation is required even if it was prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial when it forms a
basis, either in whole or in part, of the opinions of an expert who is expected to be called as a witness.
c. Tangible form. Subject to rules 1.508(1)(d) and (e), if the discoverable factual observations,
tests, supporting data, calculations, photographs, or opinions of an expert who will be called as a
witness have not been recorded and reduced to tangible form, the court may order these matters be
reduced to tangible form and produced within a reasonable time before the date of trial.
d. Trial preparation protection for draft reports or interrogatory answers. Rule 1.503(3) protects
drafts of any report or disclosure required under rule 1.500(2), regardless of the form in which the
draft is recorded.
e. Trial preparation protection for communications between a party’s attorney and expert
witnesses. Rule 1.503(3) protects communications between the party’s attorney and any witness
required to provide a report under rule 1.500(2)(b), regardless of the form of the communications,
except to the extent that the communications:
(1) Relate to compensation for the expert’s study or testimony.
(2) Identify facts or data that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert considered in
forming the opinions to be expressed.
(3) Identify assumptions that the party’s attorney provided and that the expert relied on in forming
the opinions to be expressed.
1.508(2) Expert who is not expected to be called as a witness. The disclosure of the same
information concerning an expert used for consultation and who is not expected to be called as a
witness at trial is required if the expert’s work product forms a basis, either in whole or in part, of
the opinions of an expert who is expected to be called as a witness. Otherwise, a party may discover
the identity of and facts known, or mental impressions and opinions held, by an expert who has
been retained or specially employed by another party in anticipation of litigation or preparation for
trial and who is not expected to be called as a witness at trial, only as provided in rule 1.516 or
upon a showing of exceptional circumstances under which it is impracticable for the party seeking
discovery to obtain facts or opinions on the same subject by other means.
1.508(3) Duty to supplement discovery as to experts. For an expert whose report must be disclosed
under rule 1.500(2)(b), the party’s duty to supplement extends both to information included in the
report and to information given during the expert’s deposition. Any additions or changes to this
information must be disclosed no later than 30 days before trial. Failure to disclose or supplement
the identity of an expert witness or the information described in rule 1.500(2) is subject to sanctions
under rule 1.517(3)(a).
1.508(4) Expert testimony at trial. The expert’s direct testimony at trial may not be inconsistent
with or go beyond the fair scope of the expert’s disclosures, report, deposition testimony, or
supplement thereto.
1.508(5) Expert fees during discovery. Unless manifest injustice would result, the court shall
require that the party seeking discovery pay the expert a reasonable fee for time spent in responding to
discovery under rules 1.508(1) and 1.508(2). With respect to discovery obtained under rule 1.508(1),
the court may require, and with respect to discovery obtained under rule 1.508(2), the court shall
require the party seeking discovery to pay the other party a fair portion of the fees and expenses
reasonably incurred by the latter party in obtaining facts and opinions from the expert. Any fee
which the court requires to be paid shall not exceed the expert’s customary hourly or daily fee; and,
in connection with a party’s deposition of another party’s expert, shall include the time reasonably
and necessarily spent in connection with such deposition, including time spent in travel to and from
the deposition, but excluding time spent in preparation.
1.508(6) Effective date. Rules 1.508(1)(a), 1.508(d), 1.508(1)(e), and 1.508(3) apply only to
actions commenced on or after January 1, 2015, provided that the court may in any case direct the
parties to comply with all or part of the rules as part of a pretrial order.
History
[Report 1943; amendment 1957; amendment 1973; Report May 28, 1987, effective August 3, 1987; June 23, 1988, effective September 1, 1988; October 31, 1997, effective January 24, 1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002; August 28, 2014, effective January 1, 2015]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
29ff67a3557587766b1518bee1ecf36e2d9382cbb6516b814b30e6e12513ad5a
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.