IA · rules
Iowa R. Civ. P. 1.1004
New trial
On motion, the aggrieved party may have an adverse verdict, decision, or
report or some portion thereof vacated and a new trial granted if any of the following causes materially
affected movant’s substantial rights:
1.1004(1) Irregularity in the proceedings of the court, jury, master, or prevailing party; or any
order of the court or master or abuse of discretion which prevented the movant from having a fair
trial.
1.1004(2) Misconduct of the jury or prevailing party.
1.1004(3) Accident or surprise which ordinary prudence could not have guarded against.
1.1004(4) Excessive or inadequate damages appearing to have been influenced by passion or
prejudice.
1.1004(5) Error in fixing the amount of the recovery, whether too large or too small, in an action
upon contract or for injury to or detention of property.
1.1004(6) That the verdict, report or decision is not sustained by sufficient evidence, or is contrary
to law.
1.1004(7) Material evidence, newly discovered, which could not with reasonable diligence have
been discovered and produced at the trial.
1.1004(8) Errors of law occurring in the proceedings, or mistakes of fact by the court.
1.1004(9) On any ground stated in rule 1.1003, the motion specifying the defect or cause giving
rise thereto.
History
[Report 1943; amendment 1945; October 31, 1997, effective January 24, 1998; November 9, 2001, effective February 15, 2002]
Provenance
- Source
- www.legis.iowa.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
833c947eccb98ca61b684324a5a9ba560781533d5a7963b936fd1be4aef82e9e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.