HI · rules
Haw. Sup. Ct. Order: order589
order589
Electronically Filed
Supreme Court
SCMF-24-0000565
23-AUG-2024
08:54 AM
Dkt. 1 ORD
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI
________________________________________________________________
In the Matter of the
GRADUATE INTERN PILOT PROJECT
________________________________________________________________
ORDER ESTABLISHING A GRADUATE INTERN PILOT PROJECT
(By: Recktenwald, C.J., McKenna, Eddins, Ginoza, and Devens, JJ.)
Upon consideration of the July 18, 2024 joint letter from
the City and County of Honolulu Department of the Prosecuting
Attorney, the County of Maui Department of the Prosecuting
Attorney, the County of Hawaiʻi Office of the Prosecuting
Attorney, and the County of Kauaʻi Office of the Prosecuting
Attorney (Hawaiʻi Prosecuting Attorneys), requesting this court
authorize recent law school graduates to temporarily engage in
the supervised limited practice of law under Rules of the
Supreme Court of the State of Hawaiʻi (RSCH) Rule 7, and pursuant
to this court’s inherent and constitutional authority under
article VI, section 7 of the Hawaiʻi Constitution to regulate the
practice of law,
It is hereby ordered that the Graduate Intern Pilot Project
is established as follows:
1. Under this pilot project, the definition of “law-student intern” in RSCH Rule 7.2(a) shall also include a person
who, within the last twelve (12) months, graduated in good
standing from a law school fully or provisionally accredited by
the American Bar Association, and is employed by any of the
Hawaiʻi Prosecuting Attorneys or the State of Hawaiʻi Office of
the Public Defender (Graduate Interns).
2. Graduate Interns may engage in activities permitted
under RSCH Rules 7.4 and 7.5, provided the Graduate Interns, at
all times, satisfy the qualification procedures and requirements
set forth in RSCH Rule 7 and this order.
3. All provisions of RSCH Rule 7 shall apply to the
Graduate Intern Pilot Project, except for the following
provision in RSCH Rule 7.6(a), which shall not apply: “After
graduation, the law-student intern may continue to represent a
client in cases initiated before graduation if such
representation is deemed appropriate by the supervising lawyer,
but in no case shall the continued representation under this
Rule extend beyond the swearing-in date of the next bar
examination.”
4. The presiding judge of the court in which the Graduate
Intern appears shall have the discretion to revoke the Graduate
Intern’s authority to appear in the case.
5. The Graduate Intern Pilot Project is established
effective upon entry of this order and shall expire on November
30, 2024, unless extended by order of this court.
6. Any government entity that participates in this pilot
project shall file a report, which may be a joint report with
any other entity, on the pilot project’s performance (e.g., the
number of interns and/or matters included in the pilot project).
The report may include a recommendation regarding the long-term
or permanent expansion of RSCH Rule 7 to allow new law school
graduates to temporarily engage in the supervised limited
practice of law and any other information to determine the pilot
2
project’s benefits or disadvantages. This report shall be filed
with the clerk of the supreme court by November 1, 2024. The
court further invites any participating government entity to
submit interim reports on matters relevant to the pilot project,
including comments or requested changes, on an ongoing basis.
The court will receive and consider supplemental reports.
7. During the course of this pilot project, the court
invites public comments on all aspects of the pilot project, and
encourages any interested person, or entity to submit comments
on an ongoing basis. The comments may be made in writing to the
Judiciary Communications and Community Relations Office by mail
to 417 South King Street, Honolulu, HI 96813, by facsimile to
808-539-4801, by e-mail to pao@courts.hawaii.gov, or by online
form available at: https://www.courts.state.hi.us/comment-on-
proposed-rules-changes.
8. This pilot project may be terminated, amended, or
further extended by subsequent order.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, August 23, 2024.
/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald
/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Todd W. Eddins
/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza
/s/ Vladimir P. Devens
3
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-hi-39l-order589-2026-10-02
- Content hash
35f5de77269ddfd4df84599d2582fa13b99fe6083ba7adee1c481e90e9d661ef
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.