Bindinglaw

HI · rules

Haw. Sup. Ct. Order: order56

order56

activein force · 2026-10-02 – presentcompiled-edition

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCMF-14-0000913

01-JUL-2014

09:16 AM

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI‘I

In the Matter of the Seals

of the Courts for the State of Hawai‘i

ORDER

(By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

WHEREAS, Section 606-3 (Supp. 2013) of the Hawai‘i Revised

Statutes (HRS), provides that: "Each court of record shall have

a seal, which shall be approved by the Supreme Court"; and

WHEREAS, the Chief Court Administrator of the Second

Circuit for the State of Hawai‘i has submitted for approval a court

seal design for use by the District Court of the Second Circuit and

a court seal design for use by the Circuit Court of the Second Circuit.

NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The two (2) court seal designs submitted by the Second

Circuit and appended hereto, are approved;

2. Any future revisions of these court seals shall be

submitted to the Supreme Court for approval in accordance with HRS

section 606-3; and

3. The Chief Clerk of the Supreme Court shall maintain

a file with copies of all court seals being used by the Second Circuit.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai‘i, July 1, 2014.

/s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

2

Provenance

Source
www.courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-hi-40f-order56-2026-10-02
Content hash
0a55615154c9a37c413983c14e12ab1fdb30ed40ba4f7343cb5734bfb78209a6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.