Bindinglaw

HI · rules

Haw. R. Prof. Conduct 3.2

EXPEDITING LITIGATION

activein force · 2026-01-01 – presentcompiled-edition

A lawyer shall make reasonable efforts to expedite litigation consistent with the legitimate interests of the client.

COMMENT:

[1]Dilatory practices bring the administration of justice into disrepute. Significant delay should not be indulged merely for the convenience of the advocates, or for the purposes of frustrating an opposing party's attempt to obtain rightful redress or repose. It is not a justification that similar conduct is often tolerated by the bench and bar. The question is whether a competent lawyer acting in good faith would regard the course of action as having some substantial purpose other than delay. Realizing financial or other benefit from

otherwise improper delay in litigation is not a legitimate interest of the client.

Provenance

Source
www.courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-10-02
Edition
supplied-hi-24-2026-01-01
Content hash
a95669db71b8841775409b9c0f8e993d2306b02ed2ca0548e30b440a974fadf5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.