HI · rules
Haw. R. Civ. P. Form 10
Complaint for Negligence Where Plaintiff Is Unable to Determine Definitely Whether the Person Responsible Is C. D. or E. F. or Whether Both Are Responsible and Where Plaintiff’s Evidence May Justify a Finding of Wilfulness or of Recklessness or of Negligence.
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT
STATE OF HAWAIʻI
A.B., Plaintiff, ) Civil No. _______________
)
vs. )
) COMPLAINT
C.D. and E.F., Defendants. )
)
1. Allegation of residence of parties.
2. On June 1, 1952, in a public highway called King Street, Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, defendant C. D. or defendant E. F., or both defendants C. D. and E. F. willfully or recklessly or negligently drove or caused to be driven a motor vehicle against plaintiff who was then crossing said highway.
3. As a result plaintiff was thrown down and had plaintiff’s leg broken and was otherwise injured, was prevented from transacting plaintiff’s business, suffered great pain of body and mind, and incurred expenses for medical attention and hospitalization in the sum of one thousand dollars.
Wherefore plaintiff demands judgment against C. D. or against E. F. or against both in the sum of ______________________________ dollars and costs.
(Rev. 07/09/25)
Provenance
- Source
- www.courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-10-02
- Edition
- supplied-hi-03-2026-07-01
- Content hash
91ca275b5aa98956b52b251516a4db5e23432c5a7201f181ccd5d9c5b5d08802
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.