HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 9.41A
CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE IN THE FIRST DEGREE –
REMOVES MINOR FROM THE STATE:
H.R.S. § 707-726(1)(c)
(Applicable to offenses occurring on or after June 12, 1996)
[In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the]
[The] Defendant, (defendant's name), is charged with the offense
of Custodial Interference in the First Degree.
A person commits the offense of Custodial Interference in
the First Degree if he/she, in the absence of a court order
determining custody or visitation rights, intentionally or
knowingly [takes] [detains] [conceals] [entices away] a minor
with the intent to deprive another person or a public agency of
their right to custody, and removes the minor from the State of
Hawai`i.
There are five elements of the offense of Custodial
Interference in the First Degree, each of which the prosecution
must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These five elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of
(name of county), the Defendant removed the minor from the State
of Hawai`i; and
2. That the Defendant, in the absence of a court order
determining custody or visitation rights, [took] [detained]
[concealed] [enticed away] a minor; and
3. That the Defendant did so intentionally or knowingly;
and
4. That the Defendant did so with the intent to deprive
another person or a public agency of their right to custody; and
5. That the Defendant knew, at that time, the person was
a minor.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
632971e95f436fa92d2d4268dc06598f3f2b3ddfc612aaec1a35d5e3a97ab4e8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.