HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 9.08
EXTREME MENTAL OR EMOTIONAL DISTURBANCE MANSLAUGHTER:
H.R.S. § 707-702(2)
If and only if you unanimously find that all the elements
of (specify murder charge) have been proven by the prosecution
beyond a reasonable doubt [and you unanimously find that the
defendant was not justified in using deadly force], then you
must consider whether, at the time defendant caused the death,
he/she was under the influence of extreme mental or emotional
disturbance for which there is a reasonable explanation. The
reasonableness of the explanation shall be determined from the
viewpoint of a person in the defendant's situation under the
circumstances of which the defendant was aware or as the
defendant believed them to be.
The prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that
the defendant was not, at the time that he/she caused the death
of (decedent), under the influence of extreme mental or
emotional disturbance for which there is a reasonable
explanation. If you unanimously find that the prosecution has
done so, then you must return a verdict of guilty of (specify
murder charge). If you unanimously find that the prosection has
not done so, then you must return a verdict of guilty of
Manslaughter based upon extreme mental or emotional disturbance.
If you are unable to reach a unanimous agreement as to
whether the prosecution has proved, or failed to prove, that the
defendant was not under the influence of extreme mental or
emotional disturbance, then your decision is not unanimous and a
verdict may not be returned on this offense.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
13e853326e802d6c4fdea3c0497258d7608f8bb04f90f6bc6fe54af342cc32e3
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.