HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 12.00A
Interference With Reporting an Emergency or Crime
H.R.S. § 710-1010.5
[In Count (count number) of the [Indictment/ Complaint/
Information], the] [The] Defendant, (defendant’s name), is
charged with the offense of Interference with Reporting an
Emergency or Crime.
A person commits the offense of Interference with Reporting
an Emergency or Crime if he/she intentionally or knowingly
prevents a victim or witness to a criminal act from calling a
911-emergency telephone system, obtaining medical assistance, or
making a report to a law enforcement officer.
There are three material elements of the offense of
Interference with Reporting an Emergency or Crime, each of which
the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These three elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of
(name of county), the Defendant intentionally or knowingly
prevented another person from [calling a 911-emergency telephone
system] [obtaining medical assistance] [making a report to a law
enforcement officer]; and
2. That the Defendant was aware or believed or hoped that
the other person was a [victim of a criminal act] [witness to a
criminal act]; and
3. That the Defendant was aware, or believed or hoped
that the other person [was calling a 911-emergency telephone
system] [was obtaining medical assistance] [was making a report
to a law enforcement officer].
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
1d43cf661c21d21d1bfe208f5c93b8c7340a2d704aa3608a793c73c9175976fb
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.