Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.52

Inference: Theft of Livestock H.R.S. § 708-835.5(2)

activein force · 2008-03-14 – presentas-observed

HRS §708-835.5(2)

If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant

possessed the livestock without a valid livestock ownership and

movement certificate, you may, but are not required to infer

that the livestock is or has been stolen. If you do so infer,

you must nevertheless consider all the evidence in the case in

determining whether the State has proven beyond a reasonable

doubt that such livestock is or has been stolen.

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
54bac5a8a0cc0df0bfee996a1533b331b93b6006a9700ee28978af85d1ed5e3d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.