HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.49
Identity Theft 3° H.R.S. § 708-839.8
H.R.S. § 708-839.8
[In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the]
[The] Defendant, (defendant's name) is charged with the offense
of Identity theft in the Third Degree.
A person commits the offense of Identity Theft in the Third
Degree if he/she intentionally makes or causes to be made,
either directly or indirectly, a transmission of any personal
information of another by [any oral statement] [any written
statement] [any statement conveyed by any electronic means],
with the intent to commit the offense of [theft in the third
degree] [theft in the fourth degree] from any person or entity.
There are two material elements of the offense of Identity
Theft in the Third Degree, each of which the prosecution must
prove beyond a reasonable doubt.
These two elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of
(name of county), the Defendant intentionally made or caused to
be made, either directly or indirectly, a transmission of any
personal information of another by [any oral statement] [any
written statement] [any statement conveyed by any electronic
means]; and
2. That the Defendant did so with intent to commit the
offense of theft in the third degree and/or theft in the fourth
degree from any person or entity.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
0562256cb003297509080fa5032361cc961be9660611ea58266bb57214b592e1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.