HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.36A
Inference: Fraudulent Use of a Credit Card -- Uses,
USES, ATTEMPTS OR CONSPIRES TO USE:
HRS § 708-8100(4)
If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that notice of
revocation was mailed to Defendant at the address set forth on
the credit card or at the last known address by registered or
certified mail, return receipt requested, and, if the address
was more than 500 miles from the place of mailing by air mail,
you may, but are not required to, infer that the Defendant had
knowledge of the revocation of the credit card [four] [ten*]
days after mailing. If you do so infer, you must nevertheless
consider all the evidence in the case in determining whether the
State has proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant
had knowledge of the revocation of the credit card [four] [ten*]
days after mailing.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
63487add657fdefc3b38fc7183ddaace81b1ac8c0938bb36bc9c5e57e2e5fbe1
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.