Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.24A

Affirmative Defense: Unauthorized Control of Propelled

activein force · 2007-03-15 – presentas-observed

PROPELLED VEHICLE – OPERATING: H.R.S. § 708-836(3)

It is an affirmative defense to a charge of Unauthorized

Control of Propelled Vehicle that the Defendant:

(a) Received authorization to use the vehicle from an

agent of the owner where the agent had actual or apparent

authority to authorize such use; or

(b) Is a lien holder or legal owner of the propelled

vehicle, or an authorized agent of the lien holder or legal

owner, engaged in the lawful repossession of the propelled

vehicle.

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
a12a1283bdfa2820ed3cbce9e9181190f9436fad7bfc71fef1c1bdc67c47d9b9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.