Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.24

Unauthorized Control of Propelled Vehicle -- Operating

activein force · 2007-03-15 – presentas-observed

H.R.S. § 708-836

[In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the]

[The] Defendant, (defendant’s name), is charged with the offense

of Unauthorized Control of Propelled Vehicle.

A person commits the offense of Unauthorized Control of

Propelled Vehicle if he/she intentionally or knowingly* exerts

unauthorized control over another’s propelled vehicle by

operating the vehicle without the owner’s consent.

There are three material elements of the offense of

Unauthorized Control of Propelled Vehicle, each of which the

prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

These three elements are:

1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of

(name of county), the Defendant exerted unauthorized control

over another’s propelled vehicle; and

2. That the Defendant did so by operating the vehicle

without the owner’s consent; and

3. That the Defendant did so intentionally or knowingly*.

“Owner” means the [registered owner of the propelled

vehicle or the unrecorded owner of the vehicle pending transfer

of ownership][legal owner, provided there is no registered owner

of the propelled vehicle or unrecorded owner of the vehicle

pending transfer of ownership].

“Propelled vehicle” means an automobile, airplane,

motorcycle, motorboat, or other motor-propelled vehicle.

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
ff98e093c8aeef4be25c1d3a0b42a11e914824a42cd024fffcad82ee4c37d318
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.