HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.23
Theft 3° -- Services H.R.S. § 708-832(1)(a) (4/19/96,
HRS § 708-832(1)(a)
[In Count (count number) of the Indictment/Complaint, the]
[The] Defendant, (defendant’s name), is charged with the offense
of Theft in the Third Degree.
A person commits the offense of Theft in the Third Degree
if he/she intentionally obtains services known by him/her to be
available only for compensation, by [deception] [false token]
[other means to avoid payment for the services] and the value of
the services exceeds $100.
There are five material elements of the offense of Theft in
the Third Degree, each of which the prosecution must prove
beyond a reasonable doubt.
These five elements are:
1. That, on or about (date) in the [City and] County of
(name of county), Defendant obtained services by [deception]
[false token] [other means to avoid payment for the services];
and
2. That the Defendant did so intentionally; and
3. That the Defendant knew, at that time, the services
were available only for compensation; and
4. That the Defendant was aware or believed the value of
the services exceeded $100; and
5. That the value of the services exceeded $100.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
414b1600f736be96c551e08720fbc884f234607b17d35ec7dd2b69c24e5e1a0b
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.