HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.13A
Inference: Theft 1° -- Receiving Stolen Property
RECEIVING STOLEN PROPERTY: HRS § 708-830(7)
If you find beyond a reasonable doubt that the Defendant,
at the time he/she received the property, was a dealer in
property of the kind received and that he/she acquired the
property for a consideration which he/she knew was far below its
reasonable value, you may, but are not required to, infer that
the Defendant knew the property was stolen. If you do so infer,
you must nevertheless consider all the evidence in the case in
determining whether the State has proven beyond a reasonable
doubt that the Defendant knew the property was stolen.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
c1a1a2043d67214f6dea4eccb579d775f22ea2b98413d139d4b5b3cdd5e907f9
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.