Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Pattern Jury Instr. (Criminal) 10.03D

Affirmative Defense to Unauthorized Entry in a

activein force · 2014-12-18 – presentas-observed

Dwelling: H.R.S. § 708-812.6(3)

(Applicable to offenses occurring from

June 22, 2006 through July 4, 2011)

The Defendant has raised an affirmative defense to the

offense of Unauthorized Entry in a Dwelling. Before you may

consider the affirmative defense, you must first determine

whether the prosecution has proved all of the elements of

Unauthorized Entry in a Dwelling beyond a reasonable doubt. If

you unanimously find that the prosecution has not proved all of

the elements of that offense beyond a reasonable doubt, then you

must find the Defendant not guilty of the offense without

considering the affirmative defense. If you unanimously find

that the prosecution has proved all of the elements of the

offense beyond a reasonable doubt, then you must consider the

affirmative defense.

There are three elements for to the affirmative defense,

each of which the Defendant must prove.

These three elements are:

1. That there was a social gathering of invited guests at

the dwelling the Defendant entered; and

2. That the Defendant intended to join the social

gathering; and

3. That the Defendant did not intend to commit any unlawful

act other than the unlawful entry.

The Defendant must prove an affirmative defense by a

preponderance of the evidence. This means that the Defendant

must prove that it is more likely than not, or more probable

than not, that each element of the affirmative defense occurred.

In determining whether the defendant has proved an affirmative

defense by a preponderance of the evidence, you must consider

all of the evidence that has been presented to you regardless of

who presented it.

Your determination as to whether the Defendant has proved

the affirmative defense must be unanimous and is to be indicated

by answering “Yes” or “No” on a special interrogatory that will

be provided to you.

If you are unable to reach a unanimous agreement as to

whether the affirmative defense has been proved or not been

proved, then a verdict may not be returned on the charge of

Unauthorized Entry in a Dwelling.

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
327bb94fb746e95f55f933667891b54d659c47f42af2af7f98cacf6b5dc7fc55
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.