Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 6.2

FORESEEABILITY

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

In determining whether a person was negligent, it may help

to ask whether a reasonable person in the same situation would

have foreseen or anticipated that injury or damage could result

from that person's action or inaction. If such a result would be

foreseeable by a reasonable person and if the conduct reasonably

could be avoided, then not to avoid it would be negligence.

Only the general nature of the harm need be foreseeable. A

person need not have foreseen the precise nature of the

resulting injury or the exact manner in which it occurred.

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
ab27c0257afe11629640e1d0ab3acf7567a329081906050cb8b1b7abfe2a732c
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.