HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 17.4
PREMISES LIABILITY – MARKETING METHOD OR MODE OF OPERATION1
A business has a duty to exercise reasonable care to
maintain its premises in a safe condition and remove
unreasonable risks of harm that arise from the way in which a
business is conducted or operated.
To prevail on his/her/their claim, plaintiff(s) must prove
all of the following elements:
1. A condition on/in the land/property/building posed an
unreasonable risk of harm; and
2. Defendant(s) failed to take reasonable steps to remove
the unreasonable risk of harm or to give adequate
warning of that risk;2 and
3. Defendant’s(s’) failure was a legal cause of injury to
plaintiff(s).
1 This instruction applies to cases with facts similar to Gump v.
Walmart Stores, Inc., 93 Hawaiʻi 428, 5 P.3d 418 (App. 1999), aff'd in
relevant part, rev'd in other part, 93 Hawaiʻi 417, 5 P.3d 407 (2000).
2 The phrase “or to give adequate warning of that risk” does not
appear in Gump.
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-03
- Edition
- 2026-09-03
- Content hash
4b623baaa8325107800fb8e26557c24c57f3bf7503b41bd090d71c8f54a3630e
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.