HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 16.9
WRONGFUL TERMINATION: BREACH OF EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT FOR SPECIFIED TERM
To prevail on the claim for breach of employment contract,
plaintiff(s) must prove all of the following elements:
1. Defendant(s) contracted to employ plaintiff(s) for [a
specified period of time]; and
2. Plaintiff(s) was/were ready, willing, and able to
perform the contract during the specified term;1 and
3. Defendant(s) terminated plaintiff’s(s’) employment
contract before the completion of the specified term;
and
4. The termination was a legal cause of damage to
plaintiff(s).
PRACTICE NOTE: This instruction states the general law, and does
not attempt to address instances in which defendants admit
terminating the employment contract for cause before completion
of the specified term. In such instances, Instruction Nos.
16.10 and 16.11 should be used and/or this instruction should be
modified accordingly.
1 Low v. Honolulu Rapid Transit, 50 Haw. 582, 585, 445 P.2d 372,
376 (1968).
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
c4b7e36f69546297b51dfa83c6e8591576d3c51b0a98a8719549bde24e9837ff
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.