Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 16.35

CONVICTION DISCRIMINATION: AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

Defendant(s) assert(s) the affirmative defense that the

nature of the plaintiff’s(s’) criminal conviction record bears a

rational relationship to the duties and responsibilities of the

position. If defendant(s) prove(s) this affirmative defense,

then you must find in favor of defendant(s) on the claim of

discrimination on the basis of conviction record.

Haw. Rev. Stat. § 378-2.5; Wright v. Home Depot U.S.A., Inc.,

111 Hawaiʻi 401, 142 P.3d 265 (2006); Shimose v. Hawaiʻi

Health Systems Corp., 134 Hawaiʻi 479, 345 P.3d 145 (2015).

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
e383d110eb9266aadc70708ca90f06620e693f4d028c64b3ac0c8e7c331fd8f9
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.