Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 16.23

INTENT TO DISCRIMINATE: PRIOR ACTS OF DEFENDANT

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

In determining whether defendant(s) intended to

discriminate against plaintiff(s) on the basis of [see, e.g.,

Instruction No. 6.2., for insertion here of appropriate

protected category], you may consider evidence of

defendant’s(s’) prior acts and conduct towards plaintiff’s(s’)

co-employees.

Furukawa v. Honolulu Zoological Society, 85 Hawaiʻi 7, 16, 936

P.2d 643, 652 (1997).

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
808c4c99e027c178d0ced9a1210ab4df1ddfd38fd18a0beb9d8dd36b42b3acde
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.