HI · jury_instructions
Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 16.16
HAWAII WHISTLEBLOWERS’ PROTECTION ACT: ELEMENTS OF A PARTICIPATION CLAIM
(HAW. REV. STAT. § 378-62(2))
To prevail on the claim of a violation of the Hawaii
Whistleblowers’ Protection Act, plaintiff(s) must prove all of
the following elements:
1. Plaintiff(s) was/were employed by defendant(s); and
2. Plaintiff(s) had been requested by [name of public
body] to participate in a/an
[investigation/hearing/inquiry/court action]; and
3. Defendant(s) [discharged plaintiff(s)/threatened
plaintiff(s)/discriminated against plaintiff(s) in
compensation or terms, conditions, location or
privileges of employment]; and
4. Plaintiff’s(s’) actual or potential participation as
noted above was a substantial or motivating factor in
defendant’s(s’) decision to [discharge/other adverse
employment action].
Provenance
- Source
- courts.state.hi.us
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-20
- Edition
- 2026-08-20
- Content hash
0bb25f390f85fcfad3b50a2e2d6b3bc61510e0c3f21e8ef0014558f135f4b51f
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.