Bindinglaw

HI · jury_instructions

Haw. Civil Jury Instr. 11.11

TESTS FOR DEFECTIVE DESIGN

activein force · 2026-08-20 – presentas-observed

A product is defective in its design if plaintiff(s)

prove(s) that the product was defective under any one of these

three tests:

1. The Consumer Expectation Test; or

2. The Risk-Utility Test; or

3. The Latent Danger Test.

Provenance

Source
courts.state.hi.us
Retrieved
2026-08-20
Edition
2026-08-20
Content hash
b3189019c7f9f4be36b37c2691bb1d4960c36b8f3441c874f7741c98fdff1199
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.