HI · constitutions
Haw. Const. art. IV, § 10
MANDAMUS AND JUDICIAL REVIEW
Original jurisdiction is vested in the supreme court of the State to be exercised on the petition of any registered voter whereby it may compel, by mandamus or otherwise, the appropriate person or persons to perform their duty or to correct any error made in a reapportionment plan, or it may take such other action to effectuate the purposes of this section as it may deem appropriate. Any such petition shall be filed within forty-five days of the date specified for any duty or within forty-five days after the filing of a reapportionment plan.
History
Add Const Con 1978 and election Nov 7, 1978
Provenance
- Source
- lrb.hawaii.gov
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-29
- Edition
- supplied-2026-09-29
- Content hash
f3d79a7752cd1430209c8c87ee98189d89d6c88e9b912ab75a95e83d531e5b40
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.