Bindinglaw

GA · rules

Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 36.19

Digital Recording of Court Proceedings

activein force · 2026-02-26 – presentact-effective-date

(A) Application of Rule. This rule for digital recording shall apply to all superior court

proceedings for which the use of a digital recording system is authorized pursuant to OCGA §§

5-6-41, 9-14-50, and 15-14-1. This rule does not apply to depositions, the takedown of which is

governed by OCGA § 9-11-30 (b) (4).

(B) Operation of Digital Recording Systems.

(1) Digital Monitors. The term “digital monitor,” as used in this rule, refers to the individual who

operates a digital recording system. To serve as a digital monitor, an individual must:

(a) be at least 18 years of age,

(b) be a high school graduate (or equivalent), and

(c) have undergone training approved by the chief judge of the circuit to provide the

skills necessary for effective and reliable operation of the digital recording system.

A digital monitor shall use his or her best efforts to accurately and reliably record the

proceedings and monitor the effectiveness of the digital recording system to the end that the

digital recording may be used by a certified court reporter to create an accurate transcript of the

proceedings.

(2) Storage. The digital monitor is responsible for producing digital recordings of court

proceedings using a digital recording system. These digital recordings shall be the property of

the court in which they are created. The court, through the clerk of court, court administrator, or

other designee, shall retain the digital recordings in accordance with the Official Judicial Branch

Court Records Retention Schedules.

(3) Transcription. If a party seeks a transcript of a proceeding that has been recorded by a digital

recording system as contemplated by this rule, the party shall request that the court send a copy

of the digital recording to a certified court reporter who is authorized by the Board of Court

Reporting to create transcripts. That certified court reporter shall be authorized to prepare and

certify the transcript to the same extent that he or she is currently permitted to prepare and certify

transcripts for proceedings that he or she attended and took down through any means authorized

by the Board. The form and style of the transcript shall comply with all applicable rules and

regulations. The transcript shall not be created by the digital monitor unless the digital monitor is

also a certified court reporter. Any transcript made from a digital recording of a proceeding for

which the certified court reporter was not present shall bear a statement as such:

“I, [Name], Certified Court Reporter, do hereby certify that the foregoing transcript was

generated from a digital recording made outside my presence after a review of the

recording, as well as any related materials, and that it is true and correct to the best of my

ability. I have noted any possible inaccuracies or limitations inherent in the digital

recording.”

(C) Technical Requirements of Digital Recording Systems. Each circuit that implements a digital

recording system shall determine which recording system(s) it will use, subject to the following

minimum requirements:

1. Each system shall record the audio of a court’s proceedings and store the recording in a

digital format.

2. Each system shall support multiple channel recording.

3. Each system shall allow the creation of digital backups.

4. Each system must be able to access a digital recording using rewind, fast forward,

search by timestamp, and other direct access methods to enable a system operator to

quickly find passages of interest.

5. Each system must continuously monitor all microphones.

6. Each system must continuously monitor the storage medium and provide at least visual

indication to the operator that the signal is being recorded.

7. Each system shall include microphones on counsel tables that are individually mutable

by the user.

(D) Local Protocols. Each circuit that chooses to utilize a digital recording system shall establish

its own internal written policies for managing the digital takedown process.

History

Adopted effective February 26, 2026.

Provenance

Source
georgiasuperiorcourts.org
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
1a1af882a28234f2e014afb8ff52fafc52e5a7552ed443687b5cb9f758134ce6
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.