GA · rules
Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 36.16
Electronic Filing
(A) Availability. Electronic filing shall be available when required by law and may be made
available in a court, or certain classes of cases therein, in conformity with statewide minimum
standards and rules for electronic filing adopted by the Judicial Council.
(B) Documents that may be filed electronically. Where electronic filing is available, a document
may be electronically filed in lieu of paper by the court, the clerk and any registered filer unless
electronic filing is expressly prohibited by law, these rules or court order. Electronic filing is
expressly prohibited for documents that according to law must be filed under seal or presented to
a court in camera, or for documents to which access is otherwise restricted by law or court order.
Original depositions are not “sealed documents” within the meaning of this paragraph and may
be filed electronically. See Judicial Council Rule 9.
(C) Signatures. An electronically filed document is deemed signed by the registered filer
submitting the document as well as by any other person who has authorized signature by the
filer. By electronically filing the document, the filer verifies that the signatures are authentic.
(D) Time of filing. An electronic document is presumed filed upon its receipt by the electronic
filing service provider, which provider must automatically confirm the fact, date and time of
receipt to the filer. Absent evidence of such confirmation, there is no presumption of filing.
(E) Electronic service. Upon filing, an electronically filed document is deemed served on all
parties and counsel who have waived any other form of service by registering with the electronic
filing system to receive electronic service in the case and who receive notice via the system of
the document's filing.
(F) System or user filing errors. If electronic filing or service is prevented or delayed because of
a failure of the electronic filing system, a court will enter appropriate relief such as the allowance
of filings nunc pro tunc or the provision of extensions to respond.
(G) Force and effect. Electronically filed court records have the same force and effect and are
subject to the same right of public access as are documents filed by traditional means.
(H) Pro se parties. To protect and promote access to the courts, courts shall reasonably
accommodate pro se parties by accepting and then converting and maintaining in electronic form
paper pleadings or other documents received from pro se filers.
(I) Procedure for handling misfiled or otherwise deficient or defective e-filings. Upon physical
acceptance and review of an e-filing and discovery that it was misfiled or is otherwise deficient
or defective, a clerk shall as soon as practicable provide the e-filer notice of the defect or
deficiency and an opportunity to cure or, if appropriate, reject the filing altogether. In any case,
the clerk shall retain a record of the action taken by the court in response, including date, time,
and reason. Such records shall be maintained until a case is finally concluded including the
exhaustion of all appeals. Absent a court order to the contrary, such records shall be accessible to
the parties and public upon request without the necessity for a subpoena.
History
Adopted effective June 4, 2015; amended effective January 16, 2020.
Provenance
- Source
- georgiasuperiorcourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
6698644e35bb0383c390095dae737818e24c2a0ce9674cd61bbfbdff157c8092
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.