GA · rules
Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 31.4
Motion and Order for Evaluation Regarding Mental Competency to Stand Trial
(A) In pending superior court cases, except in proceedings for involuntary treatment under
OCGA Title 37, or proceedings for the appointment of a guardian under Title 29, where the
mental competency of an accused is brought into question, the judge may, upon a proper
showing, exercise discretion and require a mental evaluation at public expense. A motion for
mental evaluation may be filed in writing, setting out allegations and grounds for such motion,
praying for a court-ordered evaluation. The judge may enter an order requiring a mental
evaluation of the defendant for the purposes of evaluating competency to stand trial. The judge
may direct the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities to perform the
evaluation at a time and place to be set by the Department in cooperation with the county sheriff
or counsel for the defendant if the defendant is not in custody. The Clerk shall forward a copy of
the order to the Department accompanied by a copy of the indictment, accusation or specification
of charges, and where available, a copy of the police arrest report, and a brief summary of any
known or alleged previous mental health treatment or hospitalization involving this particular
person. Counsel for the defendant shall forward any other background information available to
the evaluator to assist in performing adequately the requested services. Unless otherwise ordered
by the court, the Department shall submit its report to the requesting judge for distribution to the
defendant’s attorney. The evaluation shall be placed under seal and shall not be released absent a
court order. Upon the filing of a Plea of Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial, the Court shall
submit a copy of the Department’s evaluation to the prosecuting attorney.
(B) Upon the filing of a Plea of Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial, the judge shall conduct a
bench trial to determine the issue of mental competency to stand trial unless the state or the
defendant, within twenty days of filing of the plea, demands a special jury trial.
(C) Copies of suggested orders are attached as Specimen Order for Mental Evaluation Re:
Competency to Stand Trial, and Specimen Judgment and Order of the Court on the Defendant’s
Plea of Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial.
Specimen Order for Mental Evaluation Re: Competency to Stand Trial:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ___________ COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA
THE STATE OF GEORGIA INDICTMENT NO.
V._____________________ CHARGE(S):
ORDER FOR MENTAL EVALUATION
Re: COMPETENCY TO STAND TRIAL
WHEREAS the mental competency to stand trial of the above defendant has been called into
question, and this court has found that it is appropriate for evaluation to be conducted at public
expense;
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental
Disabilities conduct an evaluation of said defendant, provide treatment of the defendant, if
appropriate, and provide to this court a report of diagnosis, prognosis and its findings, with
respect to:
Competency to Stand Trial. Whether the defendant is capable of understanding the nature and
object of the proceedings; whether the defendant comprehends his or her own condition in
reference to such proceedings; and, whether the defendant is capable of rendering to counsel
assistance in providing a proper defense.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Department arrange with the county sheriff, or if the
defendant is not in custody, with the defendant’s attorney, for the prompt evaluation of said
defendant, either at the county jail, at a designated hospital, or at a location agreed with defense
counsel, with transportation of the defendant to be provided by the sheriff, where necessary, with
transportation costs to be borne by the county. Upon completion of the evaluation, if the
defendant is in custody, the evaluating facility shall notify the sheriff, who shall promptly
reassume custody of the defendant. Unless otherwise ordered by the court the Department shall
submit its report to the requesting judge for distribution.
The Clerk shall forward a copy of this order to the Department accompanied by a copy of the
indictment, accusation or specification of charges, and where available, a copy of the police
arrest report, and a brief summary of any known or alleged previous mental health treatment or
hospitalization involving this particular person. Counsel for the defendant shall forward any
other background information available to the evaluator to assist in performing adequately the
requested services.
SO ORDERED, this the ______ day of ______, 20__.
_____________________________ JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT
_____________________________ JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, GEORGIA
Specimen Judgment and Order of the Court on the Defendant’s Plea of Mental Incompetency to
Stand Trial:
IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF ___________ COUNTY
STATE OF GEORGIA
THE STATE OF GEORGIA INDICTMENT NO.
V._____________________ CHARGE(S):
JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF THE COURT ON THE
DEFENDANT’S PLEA OF MENTAL INCOMPETENCY
TO STAND TRIAL
The above stated case came on regularly before the undersigned for trial this date. The defendant
was represented by counsel.
After a hearing on defendant’s plea of mental incompetency and due consideration, the plea of
Mental Incompetency to Stand Trial is sustained.
IT IS, THEREFORE, THE ORDER of this court that the defendant be now delivered to the
sheriff of this County and that the defendant be delivered by the sheriff, or the sheriff’s lawful
deputy, to the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities, as provided by
OCGA § 17-7-130.
However, pursuant to OCGA § 17-7-130(c), the Court finds that the defendant is charged with a
nonviolent offense and the Court exercises its discretion, and directs that the evaluation is to be
performed on an outpatient basis.
The Court orders the Department of Behavioral Health and Developmental Disabilities to have a
Department physician or licensed psychologist evaluate and diagnose the defendant as to
whether there is a substantial probability that the defendant will attain mental competency to
stand trial in the foreseeable future. Such evaluation shall be performed within 90 days after the
Department has received actual custody of the defendant or, in the case of an outpatient, a court
order requiring evaluation of the defendant.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that at such time as it is determined that the defendant is capable of
understanding the nature and object of the proceedings, comprehends his or her own condition in
reference to such proceedings, and is capable of rendering to counsel assistance in providing a
proper defense, the defendant be delivered by the Department of Behavioral Health and
Developmental Disabilities to the sheriff of this county, or the sheriff’s lawful deputy, with
transportation costs to be borne by the county.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, should the Department of Behavioral Health and
Developmental Disabilities determine that in light of present day medical knowledge that
recovery of the defendant’s legal mental competency to stand trial is not expected at any time in
the foreseeable future, the defendant shall be dealt with by the Department as provided in OCGA
§ 17-7-130.
SO ORDERED, this the ______ day of ______, 20__.
_____________________________ JUDGE, SUPERIOR COURT
__________________________________JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, GEORGIA
History
Amended effective October 9, 1997; November 10, 2005; May 23, 2013.
Provenance
- Source
- georgiasuperiorcourts.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-24
- Edition
- 2026-09-24
- Content hash
36144fc66c22e7662e3a8ee3acc294160f86223ef7b39f2f6c5253518cfa0f15
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.