Bindinglaw

GA · rules

Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 3.3

Exclusive Control; Transfer of Case Assignment to Another Judge

activein force · 2021-02-25 – presentact-effective-date

(A) The judge to whom any action is assigned shall have exclusive control of such action, except

as provided in these rules, and no person shall change any assignment except by written order of

the judge affected and as provided in these rules. In this regard an assigned judge may transfer an

assigned action to another judge with the latter’s consent in which event the latter becomes the

assigned judge.

(B) A judge shall not transfer an action to another judge when the transferring judge has

knowledge of any fact that requires remittal of recusal or recusal of the transferring judge under

Rule 25 of these rules.

History

Amended effective March 9, 1989; February 25, 2021.

Provenance

Source
georgiasuperiorcourts.org
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
7be7e5d4e684a1329e19ac125a19ff48edf00447af5d50ebc95228d972e25053
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.