Bindinglaw

GA · rules

Ga. Unif. Super. Ct. R. 29.9

Fees Paid to Lawyers Under a Panel Program

activein force · 2026-04-09 – presentact-effective-date

The judge or judges of a multi-judge circuit shall determine the method of compensation to be

paid under a panel program.

Each program shall prescribe minimum fees to be paid as a total fee, regardless of hours, in

certain categories of cases, governed by these rules. In prescribing such minimums, the court

shall take into consideration the complexity of the case categories and the corresponding fee that

is presently being obtained by competent members of the local bar for such representation where

privately retained. While the fee paid under the panel program need not equate that of a

corresponding fee obtained by a private practitioner, there should be a reasonable relationship.

Compensation for a capital felony case in which the death penalty is sought shall be at the same

hourly rate as other cases, but each case should be examined by the court and the fee total should

be based on a complete examination of the individual case. Special attention should be given to

continuing counsel obligations in death penalty cases when conviction and imposition of the

death penalty occur.

The court may establish a committee composed of a designee of the chief judge, the local county

governing authority and the local bar association to perform the functions of establishing fee

guidelines and approval of fees.

Provenance

Source
georgiasuperiorcourts.org
Retrieved
2026-09-24
Edition
2026-09-24
Content hash
d880f07e9e362679b9a219e774657f09a15b8800eb6eefde11f059319adecef5
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.