FL · rules
Fla. R. Juv. P. 8.205
Transfer of Cases
(a) Transfer of Cases Within Circuit Court. If it should
appear at any time in a proceeding initiated in a division other than
the division of the circuit court assigned to handle dependency
matters that facts are alleged that essentially constitute a
dependency or the termination of parental rights, the court may
upon consultation with the administrative judge assigned to
dependency cases order the transfer of action and the transmittal of
all relevant documents to the division assigned to handle
dependency matters. The division assigned to handle dependency
matters shall then assume jurisdiction only over matters pertaining
to dependency, custody, visitation, and child support.
(b) Transfer of Cases Within the State of Florida. The
court may transfer any case at any point during the proceeding
after adjudication, when adjudication is withheld, or before
adjudication where witnesses are available in another jurisdiction,
to the circuit court for the county in which is located the domicile or
usual residence of the child or such other circuit as the court may
determine to be for the best interest of the child and to promote the
efficient administration of justice. The transferring court must enter
an order transferring its jurisdiction and certifying the case to the
proper court, furnishing all parties, the clerk, and the attorney’s
office handling dependency matters for the state in the receiving
court a copy of the order of transfer within 5 days. The clerk must
also transmit a certified copy of the file to the receiving court within
5 days.
(c) Transfer of Cases Among States. If it should appear at
any time that an action is pending in another state, the court may
transfer jurisdiction over the action to a more convenient forum
state, may stay the proceedings, or may dismiss the action.
History
Committee Notes 1992 Amendment. Plans under rule 8.327 were deleted in the 1991 revision to the rules, but are being reinstated as “stipulations” in the 1992 revisions. This change corrects the cross-reference. Editor’s Note On October 18, 2012, the Supreme Court of Florida issued a revised opinion in case number SC11-399, which was originally issued on June 21, 2012. See In re Amendments to the Florida Rules of Judicial Administration, 102 So. 3d 451(Fla. 2012). The opinion provides in relevant part: “First, the new electronic filing requirements the Courts adopts will become effective in the civil, probate, small claims, and family law divisions of the trial courts, as well as for appeals to the circuit courts in these categories of cases, on April 1, 2013, at 12:01 a.m., except as may be otherwise provided by administrative order. Electronic filing will be mandatory in these divisions pursuant to rule 2.525 on that date. However, until the new rules take effect in these divisions, any clerk who is already accepting documents filed by electronic transmission under the current rules should continue to do so; attorneys in these counties are encouraged to file documents electronically under the current rules. “Next, the new electronic filing requirements the Court adopts will become effective in the criminal, traffic, and juvenile divisions of the trial courts, as well as for appeals to the circuit court in these categories of cases, on October 1, 2013, at 12:01 a.m., except as may be otherwise provided by administrative order. Electronic filing will be mandatory in these divisions under rule 2.525 on that date. The new e-filing requirements, as they apply in proceedings brought pursuant to the Florida Mental Health Act (Baker Act), Chapter 394, Part I, Florida Statutes, and the Involuntary Commitment of Sexually Violent Predators Act (Jimmy Ryce), Chapter 394, Part V, Florida Statutes, will also not be mandatory in these cases until October 1, 2013. As stated above, until the new rules take effect in these divisions and proceedings, any clerk who is already accepting electronically filed documents under the current rules should continue to do so; attorneys are again encouraged to utilize existing electronic filing procedures under the current rules. “However, until the new rules and procedures take effect in the district courts, any clerk who is already accepting documents filed by electronic transmission may continue to do so; attorneys in these districts are encouraged to file documents electronically. Clerks will not be required to electronically transmit the record on appeal until July 1, 2013, at 12:01 a.m. Until July 1, we encourage clerks, whenever possible, to electronically transmit the record under the new rules and requirements. “(W)e note that, in all types of cases, pursuant to amended rule 2.525(d) self-represented parties and self-represented nonparties, including nonparty governmental or public agencies, and attorneys excused from e-mail service under Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.516 will be permitted, but nor required, to file documents electronically. By order of November 28, 2012, in case number SC11-399, the Court released a revised implementation schedule, which provides, in pertinent part: “The e-filing rules adopted in the October 2012 opinion will be mandatory in this (Supreme) Court on February 27, 2013, at 12:01 a.m.; and effective earlier on a voluntary basis as will be indicated by further administrative order of the chief justice. “Thereafter, the e-filing rules will be mandatory in the Second District Court of Appeal on July 22, 2013, at 12:01 a.m.; in the Third District Court of Appeal on September 27, 2013, at 12:01 a.m.; in the Fourth District Court of Appeal on October 31, 2013, at 12:01 a.m.; in the Fifth District Court of Appeal on November 27, 2013 at 12:01 a.m.; and in the First District Court of Appeal on December 27, 2013, at 12:01 a.m., unless made mandatory earlier by the chief judge of the applicable district court of appeal. The e- filing rules will be effective earlier on a voluntary trial basis in the district courts of appeal as will be indicated by further administrative order by the chief judge of the applicable district court.”
Provenance
- Source
- floridabar.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-09-14
- Edition
- 2026-09-14
- Content hash
e2ac39f529909432c7fe661495e6935730dd4e2d757337acf92dd2d3072485a0
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.