Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.850

(a) Grounds for Motion. The following grounds may be

claims for relief from judgment or release from custody by a person

who has been tried and found guilty or has entered a plea of guilty

or nolo contendere before a court established by the laws of Florida:

(1) the judgment was entered or sentence was imposed

in violation of the Constitution or laws of the United States or the

State of Florida;

(2) the court did not have jurisdiction to enter the

judgment;

(3) the court did not have jurisdiction to impose the

sentence;

(4) the sentence exceeded the maximum authorized by

law;

(5) the plea was involuntary; or

(6) the judgment or sentence is otherwise subject to

collateral attack.

(b) Time Limitations. A motion to vacate a sentence that

exceeds the limits provided by law may be filed at any time. No

other motion may be filed or considered under this rule if filed more

than 2 years after the judgment and sentence become final unless it

alleges that:

(1) the facts on which the claim is predicated were

unknown to the movant or the movant’s attorney and could not

have been ascertained by the exercise of due diligence, and the

claim is made within 2 years of the time the new facts were or could

have been discovered with the exercise of due diligence;

(2) the fundamental constitutional right asserted was

not established within the period provided for herein and has been

held to apply retroactively, and the claim is made within 2 years of

the date of the mandate of the decision announcing the

retroactivity; or

(3) the defendant retained counsel to timely file a 3.850

motion and counsel, through neglect, failed to file the motion. A

claim based on this exception may not be filed more than 2 years

after the expiration of the time for filing a motion for postconviction

relief.

(c) Contents of Motion. The motion must be under oath

stating that the defendant has read the motion or that it has been

read to him or her, that the defendant understands its content, and

that all of the facts stated therein are true and correct. The motion

must include the certifications required by subdivision (p) of this

rule and must also include an explanation of:

(1) the judgment or sentence under attack and the

court that rendered the same;

(2) whether the judgment resulted from a plea or a

trial;

(3) whether there was an appeal from the judgment or

sentence and the disposition thereof;

(4) whether a previous postconviction motion has been

filed, and if so, how many;

(5) if a previous motion or motions have been filed, the

reason or reasons the claim or claims in the present motion were

not raised in the former motion or motions;

(6) the nature of the relief sought; and

(7) a brief statement of the facts and other conditions

relied on in support of the motion.

This rule does not authorize relief based on grounds that could

have or should have been raised at trial and, if properly preserved,

on direct appeal of the judgment and sentence.

(d) Claims of Newly Discovered Evidence. If the defendant

is filing a newly discovered evidence claim based on recanted trial

testimony or on a newly discovered witness, the defendant must

include an affidavit from that person as an attachment to his or her

motion. For all other newly discovered evidence claims, the

defendant must attach an affidavit from any person whose

testimony is necessary to factually support the defendant’s claim for

relief. If the affidavit is not attached to the motion, the defendant

must provide an explanation why the required affidavit could not be

obtained.

(e) Claims of Failure to Call Witnesses.

(1) If the defendant is filing a claim of ineffective

assistance of counsel for failing to call a witness or witnesses, other

than an expert witness, the defendant must specifically allege the

identity of the witness(es), the substance of their testimony,

whether the witness(es) was available to testify at trial, and how the

defendant was prejudiced. Additionally, the defendant must identify

any known documentation, which may include, but is not limited to

police reports, sworn statements, or depositions supporting the

claim, or indicate why such documentation cannot be identified.

(2) If the defendant is filing a claim of ineffective

assistance of counsel for failing to call or investigate an expert

witness or expert witnesses, the defendant must allege how the

defendant was prejudiced for the failure to call or investigate the

expert witness(es). Should an evidentiary hearing be granted based

on a claim for failure to call or investigate an expert witness or

expert witnesses, the defendant must name the expert witness(es)

and provide any report from the expert witness(es) to the court and

the state attorney within 30 days before an evidentiary hearing.

Failure to name the expert witness(es) within the 30-day period of

time provided by this rule may, absent a showing of good cause,

result in the dismissal of such a claim with prejudice.

(f) Form of Motion. Motions must be typewritten or hand-written in legible printed lettering, in blue or black ink, double-spaced, with margins no less than 1 inch on white 8 1/2 by 11 inch

paper. No motion, including any memorandum of law, may exceed

50 pages without leave of the court upon a showing of good cause.

(g) Amendments to Motion. When the court has entered an

order under subdivision (h)(2) or (h)(3), granting the defendant an

opportunity to amend the motion, any amendment to the motion

must be served within 60 days. A motion may otherwise be

amended at any time prior to either the entry of an order disposing

of the motion or the entry of an order pursuant to subdivision (h)(5)

or directing that an answer to the motion be filed pursuant to (h)(6),

whichever occurs first. Leave of court is required for the filing of an

amendment after the entry of an order pursuant to subdivision

(h)(5) or (h)(6). Notwithstanding the timeliness of an amendment,

the court need not consider new factual assertions contained in an

amendment unless the amendment is under oath. New claims for

relief contained in an amendment need not be considered by the

court unless the amendment is filed within the time frame specified

in subdivision (b).

(h) Procedure; Evidentiary Hearing; Disposition. On filing

of a motion under this rule, the clerk shall forward the motion and

file to the court. Disposition of the motion shall be in accordance

with the following procedures, which are intended to result in a

single, final, appealable order that disposes of all claims raised in

the motion.

(1) Untimely and Insufficient Motions. If the motion is

insufficient on its face, and the time to file a motion under this rule

has expired prior to the filing of the motion, the court must enter a

final appealable order summarily denying the motion with

prejudice.

(2) Timely but Insufficient Motions. If the motion is

insufficient on its face, and the motion is timely filed under this

rule, the court shall enter a nonfinal, nonappealable order allowing

the defendant 60 days to amend the motion. If the amended motion

is still insufficient or if the defendant fails to file an amended

motion within the time allowed for such amendment, the court may

permit the defendant an additional opportunity to amend the

motion or may enter a final, appealable order summarily denying

the motion with prejudice.

(3) Timely Motions Containing Some Insufficient Claims.

If the motion sufficiently states 1 or more claims for relief and it

also attempts but fails to state additional claims, and the motion is

timely filed under this rule, the court must enter a nonappealable

order granting the defendant 60 days to amend the motion to

sufficiently state additional claims for relief. Any claim for which the

insufficiency has not been cured within the time allowed for such

amendment must be summarily denied in an order that is a

nonfinal, nonappealable order, which may be reviewed when a final,

appealable order is entered.

(4) Motions Partially Disposed of by the Court Record. If

the motion sufficiently states 1 or more claims for relief but the files

and records in the case conclusively show that the defendant is not

entitled to relief as to 1 or more claims, the claims that are

conclusively refuted must be summarily denied on the merits

without a hearing. A copy of that portion of the files and records in

the case that conclusively shows that the defendant is not entitled

to relief as to 1 or more claims must be attached to the order

summarily denying these claims. The files and records in the case

are the documents and exhibits previously filed in the case and

those portions of the other proceedings in the case that can be

transcribed. An order that does not resolve all the claims is a

nonfinal, nonappealable order, which may be reviewed when a final,

appealable order is entered.

(5) Motions Conclusively Resolved by the Court Record.

If the motion is legally sufficient but all grounds in the motion can

be conclusively resolved either as a matter of law or by reliance

upon the records in the case, the motion must be denied without a

hearing by the entry of a final order. If the denial is based on the

records in the case, a copy of that portion of the files and records

that conclusively shows that the defendant is entitled to no relief

must be attached to the final order.

(6) Motions Requiring a Response from the State

Attorney. Unless the motion, files, and records in the case

conclusively show that the defendant is entitled to no relief, the

court must order the state attorney to file, within the time fixed by

the court, an answer to the motion. The answer must respond to

the allegations contained in the defendant’s sufficiently pleaded

claims, describe any matters in avoidance of the sufficiently pleaded

claims, state whether the defendant has used any other available

state postconviction remedies including any other motion under

this rule, and state whether the defendant has previously been

afforded an evidentiary hearing.

(7) Appointment of Counsel. The court may appoint

counsel to represent the defendant under this rule. The factors to

be considered by the court in making this determination include:

the adversary nature of the proceeding, the complexity of the

proceeding, the complexity of the claims presented, the defendant’s

apparent level of intelligence and education, the need for an

evidentiary hearing, and the need for substantial legal research.

(8) Disposition by Evidentiary Hearing.

(A) If an evidentiary hearing is required, the court

must grant a prompt hearing, cause notice to be served on the state

attorney and the defendant or defendant’s counsel, determine the

issues, and make findings of fact and conclusions of law with

respect thereto.

(B) At an evidentiary hearing, the defendant has

the burden of presenting evidence and the burden of proof in

support of his or her motion, unless otherwise provided by law.

(C) The order issued after the evidentiary hearing

must resolve all the claims raised in the motion and is considered

the final order for purposes of appeal.

(i) Defendant’s Presence Not Required. The defendant’s

presence shall not be required at any hearing or conference held

under this rule except at the evidentiary hearing on the merits of

any claim.

(j) Successive Motions.

(1) A second or successive motion must be titled:

“Second or Successive Motion for Postconviction Relief.”

(2) A second or successive motion is an extraordinary

pleading. Accordingly, a court may dismiss a second or successive

motion if the court finds that it fails to allege new or different

grounds for relief and the prior determination was on the merits or,

if new and different grounds are alleged, the judge finds that the

failure of the defendant or the attorney to assert those grounds in a

prior motion constituted an abuse of the procedure or there was no

good cause for the failure of the defendant or defendant’s counsel to

have asserted those grounds in a prior motion. When a motion is

dismissed under this subdivision, a copy of that portion of the files

and records necessary to support the court’s ruling must

accompany the order denying the motion.

(k) Service on Parties. The clerk of the court must promptly

serve on the parties a copy of any order entered under this rule,

noting thereon the date of service by an appropriate certificate of

service.

(l) Rehearing. Any party may file a motion for rehearing of

any order addressing a motion under this rule within 15 days of the

date of service of the order. A motion for rehearing is not required to

preserve any issue for review in the appellate court. A motion for

rehearing must be based on a good faith belief that the court has

overlooked a previously argued issue of fact or law or an argument

based on a legal precedent or statute not available prior to the

court’s ruling. A response may be filed within 10 days of service of

the motion. The trial court’s order disposing of the motion for

rehearing must be filed within 15 days of the response but not later

than 40 days from the date of the order of which rehearing is

sought.

(m) Appeals. An appeal may be taken to the appropriate

appellate court only from the final order disposing of the motion. All

final orders denying motions for postconviction relief must include a

statement that the defendant has the right to appeal within 30 days

of the rendition of the order. All nonfinal, nonappealable orders

entered pursuant to subdivision (h) should include a statement that

the defendant has no right to appeal the order until entry of the

final order.

(n) Belated Appeals and Discretionary Review. Pursuant

to the procedures outlined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure

9.141, a defendant may seek a belated appeal or discretionary

review.

(o) Habeas Corpus. An application for writ of habeas corpus

on behalf of a prisoner who is authorized to apply for relief by

motion pursuant to this rule must not be entertained if it appears

that the applicant has failed to apply for relief, by motion, to the

court that sentenced the applicant or that the court has denied the

applicant relief, unless it also appears that the remedy by motion is

inadequate or ineffective to test the legality of the applicant’s

detention.

(p) Certification of Defendant; Sanctions. No motion may

be filed pursuant to this rule unless it is filed in good faith and with

a reasonable belief that it is timely, has potential merit, and does

not duplicate previous motions that have been disposed of by the

court.

(1) By signing a motion pursuant to this rule, the

defendant certifies that: the defendant has read the motion or that

it has been read to the defendant and that the defendant

understands its content; the motion is filed in good faith and with a

reasonable belief that it is timely filed, has potential merit, and does

not duplicate previous motions that have been disposed of by the

court; and, the facts contained in the motion are true and correct.

(2) The defendant must either certify that the

defendant can understand English or, if the defendant cannot

understand English, that the defendant has had the motion

translated completely into a language that the defendant

understands. The motion must contain the name and address of

the person who translated the motion and that person must certify

that he or she provided an accurate and complete translation to the

defendant. Failure to include this information and certification in a

motion is grounds for the entry of an order dismissing the motion

pursuant to subdivision (h)(1), (h)(2), or (h)(3).

(3) Conduct prohibited under this rule includes, but is

not limited to, the following:

(A) the filing of frivolous or malicious claims;

(B) the filing of any motion in bad faith or with

reckless disregard for the truth;

(C) the filing of an application for habeas corpus

subject to dismissal pursuant to subdivision (o);

(D) the willful violation of any provision of this

rule; and

(E) the abuse of the legal process or procedures

governed by this rule.

The court, upon its own motion or on the motion of a party,

may determine whether a motion has been filed in violation of this

rule. The court must issue an order setting forth the facts

indicating that the defendant has or may have engaged in

prohibited conduct. The order must direct the defendant to show

cause, within a reasonable time limit set by the court, why the

court should not find that the defendant has engaged in prohibited

conduct under this rule and impose an appropriate sanction.

Following the issuance of the order to show cause and the filing of

any response by the defendant, and after such further hearing as

the court may deem appropriate, the court must make a final

determination of whether the defendant engaged in prohibited

conduct under this subdivision.

(4) If the court finds by the greater weight of the

evidence that the defendant has engaged in prohibited conduct

under this rule, the court may impose one or more sanctions,

including:

(A) contempt as otherwise provided by law;

(B) assessing the costs of the proceeding against

the defendant;

(C) dismissal with prejudice of the defendant’s

motion;

(D) prohibiting the filing of further pro se motions

under this rule and directing the clerk of court to summarily reject

any further pro se motion under this rule;

(E) requiring that any further motions under this

rule be signed by a member in good standing of The Florida Bar,

who must certify that there is a good faith basis for each claim

asserted in the motion; and/or

(F) if the defendant is a prisoner, a certified copy

of the order be forwarded to the appropriate institution or facility for

consideration of disciplinary action against the defendant, including

forfeiture of gain time pursuant to Chapter 944, Florida Statutes.

(5) If the court determines there is probable cause to

believe that a sworn motion contains a false statement of fact

constituting perjury, the court may refer the matter to the state

attorney.