Bindinglaw

FL · rules

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.790

Probation and Community Control

activein force · 2026-07-13 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Suspension of the Pronouncement and Imposition of

Sentence; Probation or Community Control. Pronouncement and

imposition of sentence of imprisonment shall not be made on a

defendant who is to be placed on probation, regardless of whether

the defendant has been adjudicated guilty. An order of the court

placing a person on probation or community control shall place the

probationer to be supervised under the authority of the Department

of Corrections or such other entity as provided by law. The court

shall specify the length of time during which the defendant is to be

supervised.

(b) Revocation of Probation or Community Control;

Judgment; Sentence.

(1) Generally. Except as otherwise provided in

subdivisions (b)(2) and (b)(3) below, when a probationer or a

community controllee is brought before a court of competent

jurisdiction charged with a violation of probation or community

control, the court shall advise the person of the charge and, if the

charge is admitted to be true, may immediately enter an order

revoking, modifying, or continuing the probation or community

control. If the violation of probation or community control is not

admitted by the probationer or community controllee, the court may

commit the person or release the person with or without bail to

await further hearing or it may dismiss the charge of violation of

probation or community control. If the charge is not admitted by

the probationer or community controllee and if it is not dismissed,

the court, as soon as practicable, shall give the probationer or

community controllee an opportunity to be fully heard in person, by

counsel, or both. After the hearing, the court may enter an order

revoking, modifying, or continuing the probation or community

control. Following a revocation of probation or community control,

the trial court shall adjudicate the defendant guilty of the crime

forming the basis of the probation or community control if no such

adjudication has been made previously. Pronouncement and

imposition of sentence then shall be made on the defendant.

(2) Lunsford Act Proceedings. When a probationer or

community controllee is arrested for violating his or her probation

or community control in a material respect and is under

supervision for any criminal offense proscribed in chapter 794,

Florida Statutes, section 800.04(4), Florida Statutes, section

800.04(5), Florida Statutes, section 800.04(6), Florida Statutes,

section 827.071, Florida Statutes, or section 847.0145, Florida

Statutes, or is a registered sexual predator or a registered sexual

offender, or is under supervision for a criminal offense for which,

but for the effective date, he or she would meet the registration

criteria of section 775.21, Florida Statutes, section 943.0435,

Florida Statutes, or section 944.607, Florida Statutes, the court

must make a finding that the probationer or community controllee

is not a danger to the public prior to release with or without bail.

(A) The hearing to determine whether the

defendant is a danger to the public shall be conducted by a court of

competent jurisdiction no sooner than 24 hours after arrest. The

time for conducting the hearing may be extended at the request of

the accused, or at the request of the state upon a showing of good

cause.

(B) At the hearing, the defendant shall have the

right to be heard in person or through counsel, to present witnesses

and evidence, and to cross-examine witnesses.

(C) In determining the danger posed by the

defendant’s release, the court may consider:

(i) the nature and circumstances of the

violation and any new offenses charged;

(ii) the defendant’s past and present

conduct, including convictions of crimes;

(iii) any record of arrests without conviction

for crimes involving violence or sexual crimes;

(iv) any other evidence of allegations of

unlawful sexual conduct or the use of violence by the defendant;

(v) the defendant’s family ties, length of

residence in the community, employment history, and mental

condition;

(vi) the defendant’s history and conduct

during the probation or community control supervision from which

the violation arises and any other previous supervisions, including

disciplinary records of previous incarcerations;

(vii) the likelihood that the defendant will

engage again in a criminal course of conduct;

(viii) the weight of the evidence against the

defendant; and

(ix) any other facts the court considers

relevant.

(3) Anti-Murder Act Proceedings. The provisions of this

subdivision shall control over any conflicting provisions in

subdivision (b)(2). When a probationer or community controllee is

arrested for violating his or her probation or community control in a

material respect and meets the criteria for a violent felony offender

of special concern, or for certain other related categories of offender,

as set forth in section 948.06(8), Florida Statutes, the defendant

shall be brought before the court that granted the probation or

community control and, except when the alleged violation is based

solely on the defendant’s failure to pay costs, fines, or restitution,

shall not be granted bail or any other form of pretrial release prior

to the resolution of the probation or community control violation

hearing.

(A) The court shall not dismiss the probation or

community control violation warrant pending against the defendant

without holding a recorded violation hearing at which both the state

and the accused are represented.

(B) If, after conducting the hearing, the court

determines that the defendant has committed a violation of

probation or community control other than a failure to pay costs,

fines, or restitution, the court shall make written findings as to

whether the defendant poses a danger to the community. In

determining the danger to the community posed by the defendant’s

release, the court shall base its findings on one or more of the

following:

(i) The nature and circumstances of the

violation and any new offenses charged;

(ii) The defendant’s present conduct,

including criminal convictions;

(iii) The defendant’s amenability to

nonincarcerative sanctions based on his or her history and conduct

during the probation or community control supervision from which

the violation hearing arises and any other previous supervisions,

including disciplinary records of previous incarcerations;

(iv) The weight of the evidence against the

defendant; and

(v) Any other facts the court considers

relevant.

(C) If the court finds that the defendant poses a

danger to the community, the court shall revoke probation or

community control and sentence the defendant up to the statutory

maximum, or longer if permitted by law.

(D) If the court finds that the defendant does not

pose a danger to the community, the court may revoke, modify, or

continue the probation or community control or may place the

probationer into community control as provided in section 948.06,

Florida Statutes.

History

Committee Notes 1968 Adoption. Subdivisions (a) and (b) contain the procedural aspects of section 948.01(1), (2), and (3), Florida Statutes. It should be noted that in (b) provision is made for no pronouncements in addition to no imposition of sentence prior to the granting of probation. The terminology in section 948.01(3), Florida Statutes, is that the trial court shall “withhold the imposition of sentence.” The selected terminology is deemed preferable to the present statutory language since the latter is apparently subject to misconstruction whereby a sentence may be pronounced and merely the execution of the sentence is suspended. The Third District Court of Appeal has indicated that the proper procedure to be followed is that probation be granted prior to sentencing. A sentence, therefore, is not a prerequisite of probation. See Yates v. Buchanan, 170 So. 2d 72 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964); also see Bateh v. State, 101 So. 2d 869 (Fla. 1st DCA 1958), decided by the First District Court of Appeal to the same effect. While a trial court initially can set a probationary period at less than the maximum allowed by law, this period may be extended to the maximum prior to the expiration of the initially-set probationary period. Pickman v. State, 155 So. 2d 646 (Fla. 1st DCA 1963). This means, therefore, that any specific time set by the court as to the probationary period is not binding if the court acts timely in modifying it. It is clear, in view of the foregoing, that if a trial judge pronounces a definite sentence and then purports to suspend its execution and place the defendant on probation for the period of time specified in the sentence, matters may become unduly complicated. If such procedure is considered to be nothing more than an informal manner of suspending the imposition of sentence and thus adhering to present statutory requirements, it should be noted that the time specified in the “sentence” is not binding on the court with reference to subsequent modification, if timely action follows. On the other hand, if the action of the trial court is considered strictly, it would be held to be void as not in conformity with statutory requirements. A probationary period is not a sentence, and any procedure that tends to mix them is undesirable, even if this mixture is accomplished by nothing more than the terminology used by the trial court in its desire to place a person on probation. See sections 948.04 and 948.06(1), Florida Statutes, in which clear distinctions are drawn between the period of a sentence and the period of probation. (c) Contains the procedural aspects of section 948.06(1), Florida Statutes. 1972 Amendment. (a) of former rule deleted, as its substance is now contained in rules 3.710, 3.711, and 3.713. Former subdivisions (b) and (c) are now renumbered (a) and (b) respectively. 1988 Amendment. This amendment changes wording to conform with current responsibilities of the Department of Corrections to supervise a person placed on either probation or community control and brings community control within the scope of the rule.

Provenance

Source
floridabar.org
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
7fcebb9dc29d7bd4e6c6c9890fa09530e70560f082bd09a9b449f3a6b7bf2f24
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.790 — Probation and Community Cont… · binding.law