Bindinglaw

FL · rules

Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.171

Plea Discussions and Agreements

activein force · 2026-07-13 – presentact-effective-date

(a) In General. Ultimate responsibility for sentence

determination rests with the trial judge. However, the prosecuting

attorney and the defense attorney, or the defendant when

representing himself or herself, are encouraged to discuss and to

agree on pleas that may be entered by a defendant. The discussion

and agreement must be conducted with the defendant’s counsel. If

the defendant represents himself or herself, all discussions between

the defendant and the prosecuting attorney shall be of record.

(b) Responsibilities of the Prosecuting Attorney.

(1) A prosecuting attorney may:

(A) engage in discussions with defense counsel or

a defendant who is without counsel with a view toward reaching an

agreement that, upon the defendant’s entering a plea of guilty or

nolo contendere to a charged offense or to a lesser or related

offense, the prosecuting attorney will do any of the following:

(i) abandon other charges; or

(ii) make a recommendation, or agree not to

oppose the defendant’s request for a particular sentence, with the

understanding that such recommendation or request shall not be

binding on the trial judge; or

(iii) agree to a specific sentence; and

(B) consult with the victim, investigating officer, or

other interested persons and advise the trial judge of their views

during the course of plea discussions.

(2) The prosecuting attorney shall:

(A) apprise the trial judge of all material facts

known to the attorney regarding the offense and the defendant’s

background prior to acceptance of a plea by the trial judge; and

(B) maintain the record of direct discussions with

a defendant who represents himself or herself and make the record

available to the trial judge upon the entry of a plea arising from

these discussions.

(c) Responsibilities of Defense Counsel.

(1) Defense counsel shall not conclude any plea

agreement on behalf of a defendant-client without the client’s full

and complete consent thereto, being certain that any decision to

plead guilty or nolo contendere is made by the defendant.

(2) Defense counsel shall advise defendant of:

(A) all plea offers; and

(B) all pertinent matters bearing on the choice of

which plea to enter and the particulars attendant upon each plea

and the likely results thereof, as well as any possible alternatives

that may be open to the defendant.

(d) Responsibilities of the Trial Judge. After an agreement

on a plea has been reached, the trial judge may have made known

to him or her the agreement and reasons therefor prior to the

acceptance of the plea. Thereafter, the judge shall advise the parties

whether other factors (unknown at the time) may make his or her

concurrence impossible.

History

Committee Notes 1972 Amendment. New in Florida. Most criminal cases are disposed of by pleas of guilty arrived at by negotiations between prosecutor and defense counsel, but there was no record of the “plea negotiations,” “plea bargaining,” or “compromise.” The result has been a flood of postconviction claims which require evidentiary hearings and frequently conflicting testimony concerning the plea negotiations. There has also been criticism of the practice of requiring a defendant, upon a negotiated guilty plea, to give a negative reply to the court’s inquiry concerning any “promise” made to the defendant. This is designed to avoid the foregoing pitfalls and criticisms by having the negotiations made of record and permitting some control of them. See Commentary to Standard 3.1 ABA Standards relating to pleas of guilty. (a) From Standard 3.1a. (b) From Standard 3.2. (c) From Standard 3.3 except for omission of that part of standard which prohibits trial judge from participating in plea discussions. (d) From Standard 3.4. 1977 Amendment. This is a rewording of the prior rule in order to set out the responsibilities of the participants. The rule recognizes the ultimate responsibility of the trial judge, but it encourages prosecution and defense counsel to assist the trial judge in this regard. When the circumstances of the case so merit, it is the responsibility of each respective party to discuss a fair disposition in lieu of trial. For protection of the prosecutor and the defendant, plea discussions between the state and a pro se defendant should be recorded, in writing or electronically. (b) New in Florida. (1)(i) Restatement of policy followed by extensive revision in the form of Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11(e)(1). (1)(ii) The rule sets out discretionary minimum professional prosecutorial procedure where either victim or law enforcement officers are involved to better guide the trial judge. (2)(i) Mandatory responsibility of prosecutor contemplates disposition with no presentence investigation. (2)(ii) Mandatory record protects both the prosecutor and the pro se defendant. (c)(1) Renumbering subdivision (b) of prior rule. (2)(i) New in Florida. This proposed language makes it mandatory for defense counsel to advise fully defendant of all plea offers by the state. Defense counsel should also discuss and explain to the defendant those matters which trial judge will inquire about before accepting a plea. (2)(ii) Same as prior rule 3.171(b), paragraph 2. (d) Now embraces and renumbers former rule 3.171(c). The content of former rule 3.171(d) now appears as part of new rule 3.172.

Provenance

Source
floridabar.org
Retrieved
2026-09-14
Edition
2026-09-14
Content hash
5a15da25f4e9212f764e7ea7fe925176e249983c862c6c537863ac8d7c58523d
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Fla. R. Crim. P. 3.171 — Plea Discussions and Agreeme… · binding.law