Bindinglaw

FL · jury_instructions

Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 8.28

VIOLATION OF A RISK PROTECTION ORDER

activein force · 2026-07-29 – presentact-effective-date

§ 790.401(11)(b), Fla. Stat.

To prove the crime of Violation of a Risk Protection Order, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:

1. A [temporary] [final] risk protection order was issued by a court against (defendant).

2. (Defendant) knew that [he] [she] was prohibited from [possessing] [or] [having in [his] [her] custody or control] [or] [receiving] [or] [purchasing] [a firearm] [or] [ammunition] because of that court order.

3. (Defendant) violated the court order by knowingly [possessing] [or] [having in [his] [her] custody or control] [or] [receiving] [or] [purchasing] [a firearm] [or] [ammunition].

Give as applicable.

§ 790.001, Fla. Stat.

A “firearm” means any weapon [including a starter gun] which will, is designed to, or may readily be converted to expel a projectile by the action of an explosive; [the frame or receiver of any such weapon;] [any firearm muffler or firearm silencer;] [any destructive device;] [any machine gun]. [The term “firearm” does not include an antique firearm unless the antique firearm is used in the commission of another crime. An antique firearm is (insert definition in § 790.001, Fla. Stat.)] [A destructive device is (insert definition in § 790.001, Fla. Stat.)].

§ 790.001, Fla. Stat.

“Ammunition” means an object consisting of all of the following:

a. A fixed metallic or nonmetallic hull or casing containing a primer.

b. One or more projectiles, one or more bullets, or shot.

c. Gunpowder.

Possession.

To prove (defendant) “possessed” [a firearm] [or] [ammunition], the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] [she] a) knew of the existence of the [firearm] [or] [ammunition] and b) intentionally exercised control over it.

Give if applicable.

Control can be exercised over [a firearm] [or] [ammunition] whether it is carried on a person, near a person, or in a completely separate location. Mere proximity to [a firearm] [or] [ammunition] does not establish that the person intentionally exercised control over it in the absence of additional evidence. Control can be established by proof that (defendant) had direct personal power to control the [firearm] [or] [ammunition] or the present ability to direct its control by another.

Joint possession.

Possession of [a firearm] [or] [ammunition] may be sole or joint, that is, two or more persons may possess it.

Lesser Included Offense

VIOLATION OF A RISK PROTECTION ORDER —790.401(11)(b)

CATEGORY ONE

CATEGORY TWO

FLA. STAT

INS. NO.

None

Attempt

777.04(1)

5.1

Provenance

Source
floridabar.org
Retrieved
2026-08-18
Edition
2026-08-18
Content hash
76f0033ffc284321484affaf29a2f1df4a601ba754e2bfdf455d155e56f00d42
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.