FL · jury_instructions
Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 7.4
MURDER — SECOND DEGREE
§ 782.04(2), Fla. Stat.
In the absence of an express concession that the homicide was not excusable or justified, the trial judge must also read Instruction 7.1, Introduction to Homicide.
To prove the crime of Second Degree Murder, the State must prove the following three elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. (Victim) is dead.
2. The death was caused by the act of (defendant).
3. There was an unlawful killing of (victim) by an act imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind
Porter v. State, 384 So. 3d 839 (Fla. 1d DCA 2024) and Kenyon v. State, 429 So. 3d 473 (Fla. 4th DCA 2025) support the bracketed language in #2 below in appropriate cases.
An “act” includes a series of related actions arising from and performed pursuant to a single design or purpose. An act is “imminently dangerous to another and demonstrating a depraved mind” if it is an act or series of acts that:
1. a person of ordinary judgment would know is reasonably certain to kill or do serious bodily injury to another,
and
2. is done from ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent, and indicates an indifference to human life;
[or
denotes a wicked and corrupt disregard of the lives and safety of others].
To convict of Second Degree Murder, it is not necessary for the State to prove the defendant had an intent to cause death.
Give only if there is evidence that the defendant acted in the heat of passion on legally adequate provocation.
An issue in this case is whether (defendant) did not have a depraved mind without regard for human life because [he] [she] acted in the heat of passion based on adequate provocation. To find that the defendant did not have a depraved mind without regard for human life because [he] [she] acted in the heat of passion based on adequate provocation:
a. there must have been a sudden event that would have suspended the exercise of judgment in an ordinary reasonable person; and
b. a reasonable person would have lost normal self-control and would have been driven by a blind and unreasoning fury; and
c. there was not a reasonable amount of time for a reasonable person to cool off; and
d. a reasonable person would not have cooled off before committing the act that caused death; and
e. (defendant) was, in fact, so provoked and did not cool off before [he] [she] committed the act that caused the death of (victim).
If you have a reasonable doubt about whether the defendant had a depraved mind without regard for human life because [he] [she] acted in the heat of passion based on adequate provocation, you should not find [him] [her] guilty of Second Degree Murder.
Give if the defendant was a juvenile at the time of the crime alleged.
§ 775.082(3), Fla. Stat. Williams v. State, 242 So. 3d 280 (Fla. 2018). The finding below should be made only for cases involving Second Degree Murder where it is alleged in the charging document that the defendant actually killed, intended to kill, or attempted to kill the victim.
If you find (defendant) guilty of Second Degree Murder, you must also determine whether the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt, that [he] [she] [actually killed] [intended to kill] [or] [attempted to kill] (victim).
Lesser Included Offenses
SECOND DEGREE MURDER — 782.04(2)
CATEGORY ONE
CATEGORY TWO
FLA. STAT.
INS. NO.
Manslaughter
782.07
7.7
Aggravated Manslaughter (Child)
782.07(3)
7.7(a)
Aggravated Manslaughter (Elderly Person/Disabled Adult)
782.07(2)
7.7(a)
Aggravated Manslaughter (Officer/Firefighter/EMT/Paramedic)
782.07(4)
7.7(a)
Third degree (felony) murder
782.04(4)
7.6
Death Caused by the Unlawful Distribution by a Person Less than 18 Years of Age of [Name of Enumerated Controlled Substance(s))
782.04(5)(b)
7.3(b)
Vehicular homicide
782.071
7.9
Non-homicide lessers*
Attempted Second Degree Murder
777.04(1)
6.4
Aggravated Battery
784.045
8.4
Attempted Manslaughter
782.07 and 777.04
6.6
Felony battery
784.041(1)
8.5
Aggravated Assault
784.021
8.2
Battery
784.03
8.3
Culpable negligence
784.05(2)
8.9
Culpable negligence
784.05(1)
8.9
Assault
784.011
8.1
Provenance
- Source
- floridabar.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-18
- Edition
- 2026-08-18
- Content hash
b234de00a0365f7e6bbc1c14e949958843f4a8874ba755c07863b224b2eb3b40
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.