FL · jury_instructions
Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 30.6
INTERRUPTING OR DISTURBING A [SCHOOL] [RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY] [ASSEMBLY ACKNOWLEDGING THE DEATH OF AN INDIVIDUAL] [LAWFUL ASSEMBLY] [WITH A CREDIBLE THREAT]
§ 871.01(1), Fla. Stat.
To prove the crime of Interrupting or Disturbing a [School] [Religious Assembly] [Assembly Acknowledging the Death of an Individual] [Lawful Assembly] [With a Credible Threat], the State must prove the following element beyond a reasonable doubt:
(Defendant) willfully and maliciously interrupted or disturbed
Give as applicable.
a. a school.
b. an assembly of people meeting for the worship of God.
c. an assembly of people meeting for the purpose of acknowledging the death of an individual.
d. an assembly of people meeting for any lawful purpose.
“Willfully” means knowingly, intentionally, and purposely.
As of February 2026, it was unclear whether the statute requires actual malice or legal malice. In the absence of clarification from the legislature or an appellate court, trial judges must choose one of the following:
“Maliciously” means intentionally and without any lawful justification or excuse.
“Maliciously” means with ill will, hatred, spite, or an evil intent.
Give if § 871.01(1)(b), Fla. Stat. is charged.
If you find (defendant) guilty of Interrupting or Disturbing a [School] [Religious Assembly] [Assembly Acknowledging the Death of an Individual] [Lawful Assembly], you must further determine if the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that in doing the interrupting or disturbing, the defendant made a credible threat.
§ 784.048(1), Fla. Stat.
“Credible threat” means a verbal or nonverbal threat, or a combination of the two, including threats delivered by electronic communication or implied by a pattern of conduct, which places the person who is the target of the threat in reasonable fear for his or her safety or the safety of his or her family members or individuals closely associated with the person, and which is made with the apparent ability to carry out the threat to cause such harm. It is not necessary to prove that the person making the threat had the intent to actually carry out the threat, however, the State is required to prove the defendant was aware that a reasonable person could consider the threat as a serious expression of an intent to commit an act of violence.
Lesser Included Offenses*
INTERRUPTING OR DISTURBING A [SCHOOL] [RELIGIOUS ASSEMBLY] [ASSEMBLY ACKNOWLEDGING THE DEATH OF AN INDIVIDUAL] [LAWFUL ASSEMBLY] WITH A CREDIBLE THREAT – 871.01(1)(b)
CATEGORY ONE
CATEGORY TWO
FLA. STAT.
INS. NO.
Interrupting or Disturbing a School, Assembly (no credible threat)
871.01(1)(a)
29.15
Attempt
777.04(1)
5.1
Provenance
- Source
- floridabar.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-18
- Edition
- 2026-08-18
- Content hash
09f3cbe68afc4a7e8c2456114d88272ebc6d04ac2fbee077875665630efdf7c8
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.