FL · jury_instructions
Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Crim.) 20.18(a)
UNLAWFUL POSSESSION OF THE PERSONAL IDENTIFICATION INFORMATION OF ANOTHER PERSON
§ 817.5685, Fla. Stat.
To prove the crime of Unlawful Possession of the Personal Identification Information of Another Person, the State must prove the following two elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1. (Defendant) [intentionally] [or] [knowingly] possessed the personal identification information of (victim).
2. (Defendant) did not have authorization to do so.
Possession.
To prove (defendant) “possessed personal identification information,” the State must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] [she] a) knew of the existence of the personal identification information; and b) intentionally exercised control over that personal identification information.
Control can be exercised over personal identification information whether the information is carried on a person, near a person, or in a completely separate location. Mere proximity to the personal identification information does not establish that the person intentionally exercised control over the personal identification information in the absence of additional evidence. Control can be established by proof that (defendant) had direct personal power to control the personal identification information or the present ability to direct its control by another.
Joint Possession.
Possession of personal identification information may be sole or joint, that is, two or more persons may possess the personal identification information.
Enhancement. Give if applicable. § 817.5685(3)(b)2, Fla. Stat.
If you find (defendant) guilty of Unlawful Possession of the Personal Identification Information of Another Person, you must then determine whether the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that [he] [she] [intentionally] [or] [knowingly], and without authorization, possessed the personal identification information of five or more persons.
Definitions.
§ 817.5685(1), Fla. Stat.
“Personal identification information” means a person’s social security number, official state-issued or United States-issued driver license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number, Medicaid or food assistance account number, bank account number, credit or debit card number, and medical records.
Give if applicable. § 817.5685(2), Fla. Stat.
The personal identification information can be in any form, including, but not limited to, mail, physical documents, identification cards, or information stored in digital form.
Give if applicable. Personal identification of five or more individuals. § 817.5685(3)(b)1., Fla. Stat.
Proof that (defendant) used or was in possession of the personal identification information of five or more individuals, unless satisfactorily explained, gives rise to an inference that (defendant) used or was in possession of the personal identification information knowingly and intentionally without authorization.
Affirmative defenses. Give as applicable. § 817.5685(4) and § 817.5685(5), Fla. Stats.
§ 817.5685, Fla. Stat., and case law are silent as to (1) which party bears the burden of persuasion of the affirmative defenses and (2) the standard for the burden of persuasion. Under the common law, defendants had both the burden of production and the burden of persuasion on affirmative defenses by a preponderance of the evidence.
The Florida Supreme Court has often decided, however, that once a defendant meets the burden of production on an affirmative defense, the burden of persuasion is on the State to disprove the affirmative defense beyond a reasonable doubt (e.g., self-defense and consent to enter in a burglary prosecution). In the absence of case law, trial judges must resolve the issue via a special instruction. See the opinion in Dixon v. United States, 548 U.S. 1 (2006), for further guidance.
It is a defense to the crime of Unlawful Possession of the Personal Identification Information of Another Person if, at the time of the possession, (defendant):
a. was under the reasonable belief that such possession was authorized by law or by the consent of (victim).
b. obtained (victim’s) personal identification information from a forum or resource that was open or available to the general public or from a public record.
c. was the parent or legal guardian of (victim) and (victim) was a child.
d. was appointed by a court to act as the guardian of (victim) and was authorized to possess (victim’s) personal identification information and make decisions regarding access to that personal identification information.
e. was an employee of a governmental agency and possessed (victim’s) personal identification information in the ordinary course of business.
f. was a person engaged in a lawful business and possessed (victim’s) personal identification information in the ordinary course of business.
g. was a person who found a card or document issued by a governmental agency that contained (victim’s) personal identification information and [he] [she] took reasonably prompt action to return that card or document to its owner, to the governmental agency that issued the card or document, or to a law enforcement agency.
Lesser Included Offense
Unlawful possession of the personal identification information of another person — 817.5685
CATEGORY ONE
CATEGORY TWO
FLA. STAT.
INS. NO.
None
Attempt
777.04(1)
5.1
Provenance
- Source
- floridabar.org
- Retrieved
- 2026-08-18
- Edition
- 2026-08-18
- Content hash
775de0a38ccc0009b7ad2020678b3a526598bc23c5fab8df0c33474c380698ba
The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.
Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.