Bindinglaw

FL · jury_instructions

Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Civ.) 417.12

AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSE — DAMAGES

activein force · 2026-07-06 – presentact-effective-date

a. Failure to Mitigate Lost Wages:

[As a defense to (claimant’s) damages claim for lost wages and benefits, (defendant) claims that (claimant) could have reduced [his] [her] damages by making a reasonable effort to [seek] [retain] comparable employment. Comparable employment means alternative employment similar to [his] [her] former job in the nature of the work, responsibilities and skills required. (Claimant) need not accept employment that is unsuitable or demeaning when compared with [his] [her] former job.

If the greater weight of the evidence supports (defendant’s) claim that there was comparable employment available to (claimant) and that [he] [she] failed to make a reasonable effort to [seek] [retain] such employment, then you should reduce any lost wages and benefits you award to [he] [she] by the amount that (claimant) could have earned from the comparable employment.

If, however, the greater weight of the evidence does not support (defendant’s) claim that there was comparable employment available to (claimant) and that [he] [she] failed to make a reasonable effort to [seek] [retain] that employment, then your verdict should be for (claimant) in the total amount of [his] [her] damages for lost wages and benefits.]

Provenance

Source
floridabar.org
Retrieved
2026-08-18
Edition
2026-08-18
Content hash
9e86a3749a631f468336f84ae9c82ff7974674fcb5e1afc5573a33f3c90e6a06
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Fla. Std. Jury Instr. (Civ.) 417.12 — AFFIRMATIVE DEF… · binding.law