Bindinglaw

DE · rules

Del. Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 33

Interrogatories to parties

activein force · 1996-09-03 – presentact-effective-date

(a) Availability; procedures for use. When discovery is permitted by the Court, any party may

serve upon any other party written interrogatories to be answered by the party served or, if

the party served is a public or private corporation or a partnership or association or

governmental agency, by any officer or agent, who shall furnish such information as is

available to the party.

(b) Answers and objections. (1) Each interrogatory shall be restated as numbered and shall be

answered separately and fully in writing under oath, unless it is objected to, in which even

[event] the objecting party shall state the reasons for objection and shall answer to the extent

the interrogatory is not objectionable.

(2) The answers are to be signed by the person making them, and the objections signed by the

attorney making them.

(3) The party upon whom the interrogatories have been served shall serve a copy of the

answers, and objections if any, within 30 days after the service of the interrogatories,

except that a respondent may serve answers or objections within 45 days after service of

the summons and complaint upon that respondent. The Court may allow a shorter or

longer time. The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under Rule

37(a) with respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory.

(4) All grounds for an objection to an interrogatory shall be stated with specificity. Any

ground not stated in a timely objection is waived unless the party’s failure to object is

excused by the Court for good cause shown.

(5) The party submitting the interrogatories may move for an order under Rule 37(a) with

respect to any objection to or other failure to answer an interrogatory.

(c) Scope; use at trial. Interrogatories may relate to any matters which can be inquired into under

Rule 26(g), and the answers may be used to the extent permitted by the rules of evidence.

An interrogatory otherwise proper is not necessarily objectionable merely because an answer to

the interrogatory involves an opinion or contention that relates to the fact or the application

of law to fact, but the Court may order that such an interrogatory need not be answered until

after designated discovery has been completed or until a pretrial conference or other later

time.

(d) Option to produce business records. Where the answer to an interrogatory may be derived or

ascertained from the business records of the party upon whom the interrogatory has been

served or from an examination, audit or inspection of such business records, or from a

compilation, abstract or summary thereof, and the burden of deriving or ascertaining the

answer is substantially the same for the party serving the interrogatory as for the party

served, it is a sufficient answer to such interrogatory to specify the records from which the

answer may be derived or ascertained and to afford to the party serving the interrogatory

reasonable opportunity to examine, audit or inspect such records and to make copies,

compilations, abstracts or summaries. A specification shall be in sufficient detail to permit

the interrogating party to locate and to identify, as readily as can the party served, the records

from which the answer may be ascertained.

History

Amended, effective Sept. 3, 1996.

Provenance

Source
courts.delaware.gov
Retrieved
2026-09-23
Edition
2026-09-23
Content hash
01082bab1306755535a17369339a1aa02ed23e15e9c0655b5b8242dc5aa557ac
View the official source →

The link goes to the issuing authority’s own document — the one we read to produce this record. Where a source publishes whole titles rather than sections, your browser may need a moment to jump to the provision.

Unofficial copy of government-published law, reproduced from official sources with full provenance. Not an official publication; verify against official sources before relying on it in a filing. Records in the 'guidance' corpus, and only that corpus, are sub-regulatory (interpretive guidelines, survey procedures) and are not binding law. Validity bounds follow each jurisdiction's declared temporalBasis.

Coverage · API docs

Bindinglaw

Point-in-time US law with the receipt attached. Source URL, retrieval time, content hash, and validity dates on every answer.

curl api.binding.law/v1/law/coverage

© 2026 binding.law · a Jubal, Inc. productAttorneys and firms never pay. Ever.
Del. Fam. Ct. Civ. R. 33 — Interrogatories to parties · binding.law